BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22919556)

  • 41. Comparison of elastography based on transvaginal ultrasound and MRI in assessing parametrial invasion of cervical cancer.
    Ma X; Li Q; Wang JL; Shao J; Zhu YC; Ding W; Zhang HS; Wang HY; Shen JK
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 28211804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Is there a benefit of pretreatment laparoscopic transperitoneal surgical staging in patients with advanced cervical cancer?
    Marnitz S; Köhler C; Roth C; Füller J; Hinkelbein W; Schneider A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3):536-44. PubMed ID: 16126259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging with Background Body Signal Suppression (DWIBS) for the Pre-Therapeutic Loco-Regional Staging of Cervical Cancer: A Feasibility and Interobserver Reliability Study.
    Schleder S; May M; Scholz C; Dinkel J; Strotzer Q; Einspieler I; Dollinger M; Schreyer AG; Grassinger J; Schicho A
    Curr Oncol; 2023 Jan; 30(1):1164-1173. PubMed ID: 36661738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Incremental prognostic value of MRI in the staging of early cervical cancer: a prospective study and review of the literature.
    Bourgioti C; Chatoupis K; Rodolakis A; Antoniou A; Tzavara C; Koutoulidis V; Moulopoulos LA
    Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 26459788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Assessment of Parametrial Response by Growth Pattern in Patients With International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IIB and IIIB Cervical Cancer: Analysis of Patients From a Prospective, Multicenter Trial (EMBRACE).
    Yoshida K; Jastaniyah N; Sturdza A; Lindegaard J; Segedin B; Mahantshetty U; Rai B; Jürgenliemk-Schulz I; Haie-Meder C; Sasaki R; Pötter R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Nov; 93(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 26530747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Stage Ib, IIa, and IIb cervix cancer, postsurgical staging, and prognosis.
    Matsuyama T; Inoue I; Tsukamoto N; Kashimura M; Kamura T; Saito T; Uchino H
    Cancer; 1984 Dec; 54(12):3072-7. PubMed ID: 6498784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. MRI and PET scans for primary staging and detection of cervical cancer recurrence.
    Liyanage SH; Roberts CA; Rockall AG
    Womens Health (Lond); 2010 Mar; 6(2):251-67; quiz 268-9. PubMed ID: 20187730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Tumor diameter and volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of outcome for invasive cervical cancer.
    Wagenaar HC; Trimbos JB; Postema S; Anastasopoulou A; van der Geest RJ; Reiber JH; Kenter GG; Peters AA; Pattynama PM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):474-82. PubMed ID: 11520143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Prognostic significance of parametrial extension in patients with cervical carcinoma Stages IB, IIA, and IIB. A study of 628 cases treated by radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy with or without postoperative irradiation.
    Inoue T; Okumura M
    Cancer; 1984 Oct; 54(8):1714-9. PubMed ID: 6478409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma with MR imaging: a reappraisal of diagnostic accuracy and pitfalls.
    Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS
    Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1828-33. PubMed ID: 11511909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (stage IB-IIB): evaluation using magnetic resonance].
    Sironi S; Belloni C; Taccagni L; Del Maschio A
    Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 2236692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Prognostic Performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines.
    Wright JD; Matsuo K; Huang Y; Tergas AI; Hou JY; Khoury-Collado F; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 134(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 31188324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. MRI of cervical cancer with a surgical perspective: staging, prognostic implications and pitfalls.
    Balcacer P; Shergill A; Litkouhi B
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2557-2571. PubMed ID: 30903231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Prospective comparison between clinical and CT staging in primary cervical carcinoma.
    Walsh JW; Goplerud DR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Nov; 137(5):997-1003. PubMed ID: 6975028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Indication and efficacy of radiation therapy following radical surgery in patients with stage IB to IIB cervical cancer.
    Okada M; Kigawa J; Minagawa Y; Kanamori Y; Shimada M; Takahashi M; Oishi T; Terakawa N
    Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Jul; 70(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 9698475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Integrated pre-surgical diagnostic algorithm to define extent of disease in cervical cancer.
    Sozzi G; Berretta R; Fiengo S; Ferreri M; Giallombardo V; Finazzo F; Messana D; Capozzi VA; Colacurci N; Scambia G; Chiantera V
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 31645425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The adverse effect of treatment prolongation in cervical cancer by high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy.
    Chen SW; Liang JA; Yang SN; Ko HL; Lin FJ
    Radiother Oncol; 2003 Apr; 67(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 12758242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. FIGO Classification 2018: Validation Study in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation.
    Raut A; Chopra S; Mittal P; Patil G; Mahantshetty U; Gurram L; Swamidas J; Ghosh J; Gulia S; Popat P; Deodhar K; Maheshwari A; Gupta S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Dec; 108(5):1248-1256. PubMed ID: 32681859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of computed tomography with magnetic resonance imaging for imaging-based clinical target volume contours in cervical cancer brachytherapy.
    Zolciak-Siwinska A; Kowalczyk A; Sikorska K; Bijok M; Michalski W; Gruszczynska E
    Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(4):667-672. PubMed ID: 29764769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Complementary Prognostic Value of Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Whole-Body Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Pretreatment Assessment of Patients With Cervical Cancer.
    Sala E; Micco M; Burger IA; Yakar D; Kollmeier MA; Goldman DA; Gonen M; Park KJ; Abu-Rustum NR; Hricak H; Vargas HA
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Oct; 25(8):1461-7. PubMed ID: 26397068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.