These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22919873)
1. Why has COPE developed guidelines for cooperation between journals and research institutions? Wager E Med Arch; 2012; 66(4):220-1. PubMed ID: 22919873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Wager E; Kleinert S; Maturitas; 2012 Jun; 72(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 22541357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. American IRBs and Dutch research ethics committees: how they compare. Bergkamp L IRB; 1988; 10(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11650072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Updates to policies and procedures related to potential scientific and academic misconduct in the journals of the American Diabetes Association. Kohler CS; Diabetes; 2012 Jan; 61(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 22187374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Conflict of interest in human research ethics. Jones DJ NCBHR Commun; 1995; 6(2):5-10. PubMed ID: 11654611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Responding to allegations of scientific misconduct: the procedure at the French National Medical and Health Research Institute. Breittmayer JP; Bungener M; De The H; Eschwege E; Fougereau M; Guedj G; Kordon C; Philippe O; Postel-Vinay MC; Schaffar-Esterle L; Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 11273435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Profits and plagiarism: the case of medical ghostwriting. Anekwe TD Bioethics; 2010 Jul; 24(6):267-72. PubMed ID: 19222448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Developing a Tri-Council code of conduct for research involving humans. Rolleston F; Armour C; Stipich N J Int Bioethique; 1997; 8(1-2):67-70. PubMed ID: 11655381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Research fraud squad. McMillan I Nurs Stand; 2001 Nov 28-Dec 4; 16(11):12-3. PubMed ID: 11974840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Consensus statement on the adoption of the COPE guidelines. Surgery Journal Editors Group Am J Surg; 2010 Jul; 200(1):1. PubMed ID: 20637330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The science institutions hiring integrity inspectors to vet their papers. Abbott A Nature; 2019 Nov; 575(7783):430-433. PubMed ID: 31745367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE): Objectives and achievements 1997-2012. Wager E Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):861-6. PubMed ID: 22727914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. COPE guidelines on good publication practice. Committee on Publication Ethics. Cockcroft A Occup Environ Med; 2000 Aug; 57(8):505. PubMed ID: 10896955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cooperate to stop misconduct. Qualkenbush L Nature; 2018 May; 557(7707):637. PubMed ID: 29849159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The institutional context for research. Berger EM; Gert B Prof Ethics; 1995; 4(3-4):17-46. PubMed ID: 11655037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. What do journal editors do when they suspect research misconduct? Wager E Med Law; 2007 Sep; 26(3):535-44. PubMed ID: 17970251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Will the UK cope? Horton R Lancet; 1997 Jul; 350(9073):234. PubMed ID: 9242798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]