281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22920646)
1. Development and reproducibility of a 3D stereophotogrammetric reference frame for facial soft tissue growth of babies and young children with and without orofacial clefts.
Brons S; van Beusichem ME; Maal TJ; Plooij JM; Bronkhorst EM; Bergé SJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 22920646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of reproducibility and reliability of 3D soft tissue analysis using 3D stereophotogrammetry.
Plooij JM; Swennen GR; Rangel FA; Maal TJ; Schutyser FA; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Bergé SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 38(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 19167191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Facial morphometrics of children with non-syndromic orofacial clefts in Tanzania.
Manyama M; Larson JR; Liberton DK; Rolian C; Smith FJ; Kimwaga E; Gilyoma J; Lukowiak KD; Spritz RA; Hallgrimsson B
BMC Oral Health; 2014 Jul; 14():93. PubMed ID: 25070002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Registration of 3-dimensional facial photographs for clinical use.
Maal TJ; van Loon B; Plooij JM; Rangel F; Ettema AM; Borstlap WA; Bergé SJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2391-401. PubMed ID: 20708318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional facial morphology following surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate in patients after nasoalveolar molding.
Singh GD; Levy-Bercowski D; Yáñez MA; Santiago PE
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Aug; 10(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 17651132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and reproducibility of a 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetric imaging system.
de Menezes M; Rosati R; Ferrario VF; Sforza C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 68(9):2129-35. PubMed ID: 20646812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.
Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional quantitative evaluation of facial morphology in adults with unilateral cleft lip and palate, and patients without clefts.
Othman SA; Ahmad R; Asi SM; Ismail NH; Rahman ZA
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 52(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 24342372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative 3D soft tissue analysis of symmetry prior to and after unilateral cleft lip repair compared with non-cleft persons (performed in Cambodia).
Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Chaitidis D; Berg-Boerner I; Krol Z; Kovacs L; Schwenzer NF; Zimmerer S; Holberg C; Zeilhofer HF
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 36(8):431-8. PubMed ID: 18701312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a three-dimensional hand model using 3D stereophotogrammetry: Evaluation of landmark reproducibility.
Hoevenaren IA; Maal TJ; Krikken E; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Ulrich DJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 May; 68(5):709-16. PubMed ID: 25665488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry after mandibular reconstruction: validation of a new method using stereophotogrammetry.
Verhoeven TJ; Coppen C; Barkhuysen R; Bronkhorst EM; Merkx MA; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 22939875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D asymmetry of operated children with oral clefts.
Bugaighis I; Mattick CR; Tiddeman B; Hobson R
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Feb; 17(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 23848596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Craniofacial landmarks in young children: how reliable are measurements based on 3-dimensional imaging?
Metzler P; Bruegger LS; Kruse Gujer AL; Matthews F; Zemann W; Graetz KW; Luebbers HT
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):1790-5. PubMed ID: 23147340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a vision-based, three-dimensional facial imaging system.
Ayoub A; Garrahy A; Hood C; White J; Bock M; Siebert JP; Spencer R; Ray A
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Sep; 40(5):523-9. PubMed ID: 12943434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new method for automatic tracking of facial landmarks in 3D motion captured images (4D).
Al-Anezi T; Khambay B; Peng MJ; O'Leary E; Ju X; Ayoub A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 23218511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The accuracy of matching three-dimensional photographs with skin surfaces derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Maal TJ; Plooij JM; Rangel FA; Mollemans W; Schutyser FA; Bergé SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 18539435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A photographic system for the three-dimensional study of facial morphology.
de Menezes M; Rosati R; Allievi C; Sforza C
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1070-7. PubMed ID: 19852596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation and reproducibility of a high-resolution three-dimensional facial imaging system.
Khambay B; Nairn N; Bell A; Miller J; Bowman A; Ayoub AF
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 46(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17561318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
