143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2292147)
1. Auger and pixe microanalysis of intrauterine devices (IUDs).
Foti A; Foti AM; Torrisi L
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 1990; 17(3-4):185-94. PubMed ID: 2292147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Degradation of the copper-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device and its significance.
Chantler EN; Scott K; Filho CI; Elstein M; Faragher EB; Lorimer GW; Brough I
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Feb; 91(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 6696861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of corrosion products on a copper-containing intrauterine device during storage at room temperature.
Bastidas JM; Simancas J
Biomaterials; 1997 Feb; 18(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 9031726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy of material adherent to intrauterine contraceptive devices.
Sheppard BL; Bonnar J
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1980 Feb; 87(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 7362803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Concentrations of copper in human secretions and weight of the copper wire during the 4 to 7 years after insertion of a Cu-IUD (intrauterine device).
Larsson B; Frankman O; Hamberger L
Fertil Steril; 1981 Dec; 36(6):734-6. PubMed ID: 7308517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two years' experience with two levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and one copper-releasing intrauterine device: a randomized comparative performance study.
Nilsson CG; Allonen H; Diaz J; Luukkainen T
Fertil Steril; 1983 Feb; 39(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 6401636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Duration of use of copper releasing IUDs and the incidence of copper wire breakage.
Edelman DA; van Os WA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1990 Mar; 34(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 2311813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Copper release from copper intrauterine devices removed after up to 8 years of use.
Kjaer A; Laursen K; Thormann L; Borggaard O; Lebech PE
Contraception; 1993 Apr; 47(4):349-58. PubMed ID: 8508664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New developments in intrauterine devices.
Farr G
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1991 Sep; 12(2):9. PubMed ID: 12284281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the copper-releasing IUDs.
Chi IC
Contraception; 1991 Dec; 44(6):573-88. PubMed ID: 1773615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Analysis of bioactive intrauterine devices using high energy proton induced X-Rays (Pixe) and scanning microscopy (Sem) (Author's transl)].
Foti A; Foti AM; Calgano L; Foti G
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1981 Apr; 9(4):247-52. PubMed ID: 12336892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scanning electron microscopy, x-ray diffraction, and electron microprobe analysis of calcific deposits on intrauterine contraceptive devices.
Khan SR; Wilkinson EJ
Hum Pathol; 1985 Jul; 16(7):732-8. PubMed ID: 4007850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Five years' experience of intrauterine contraception with the Nova-T and the Copper-T-200.
Luukkainen T; Allonen H; Nielsen NC; Nygren KG; Pyörälä T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Dec; 147(8):885-92. PubMed ID: 6650625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Analysis of surface deposits on intrauterine contraceptive devices].
Yuan WR
Shengzhi Yu Biyun; 1983 Aug; 3(3):26-31. PubMed ID: 12267397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intrauterine devices: present and future.
Guillebaud J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1980; 18(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 6110576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of the ease of removal of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
Roke CM
Contraception; 1988 Jun; 37(6):555-63. PubMed ID: 3396356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Five years' experience with levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs.
Luukkainen T; Allonen H; Haukkamaa M; Lähteenmäki P; Nilsson CG; Toivonen J
Contraception; 1986 Feb; 33(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 3084167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sustained intrauterine release of levonorgestrel over five years.
Nilsson CG; Lahteenmaki PL; Luukkainen T; Robertson DN
Fertil Steril; 1986 Jun; 45(6):805-7. PubMed ID: 3086130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acceptability of an experimental intracervical device: results of a study controlling for selection bias.
Shain RN; Ratsula K; Toivonen J; Lähteenmäki P; Luukkainen T; Holden AE; Rosenthal M
Contraception; 1989 Jan; 39(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 2491982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
