These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
793 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22922434)
1. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy. Ahmed S; Berzon RA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Moinpour CM; Basch E; Reeve BB; Wu AW; Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1060-70. PubMed ID: 22922434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. Basch E; Abernethy AP; Mullins CD; Reeve BB; Smith ML; Coons SJ; Sloan J; Wenzel K; Chauhan C; Eppard W; Frank ES; Lipscomb J; Raymond SA; Spencer M; Tunis S J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4249-55. PubMed ID: 23071244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction. Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right. Sox HC Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S7-8. PubMed ID: 20473202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials: the example of health-related quality of life. Wiklund I Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 18(3):351-63. PubMed ID: 15147288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report. McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measuring treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labels. Willke RJ; Burke LB; Erickson P Control Clin Trials; 2004 Dec; 25(6):535-52. PubMed ID: 15588741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The methods of comparative effectiveness research. Sox HC; Goodman SN Annu Rev Public Health; 2012 Apr; 33():425-45. PubMed ID: 22224891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient-reported outcomes in cancer: a review of recent research and policy initiatives. Lipscomb J; Gotay CC; Snyder CF CA Cancer J Clin; 2007; 57(5):278-300. PubMed ID: 17855485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A translation table for patient-centered comparative effectiveness research: guidance to improve the value of research for clinical and health policy decision-making. Tunis SR; Messner DA; Mohr P; Gliklich RE; Dubois RW J Comp Eff Res; 2012 May; 1(3):259-62. PubMed ID: 24237407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perioperative comparative effectiveness research. Memtsoudis SG; Besculides MC Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 25(4):535-47. PubMed ID: 22099919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Reeve BB; Wyrwich KW; Wu AW; Velikova G; Terwee CB; Snyder CF; Schwartz C; Revicki DA; Moinpour CM; McLeod LD; Lyons JC; Lenderking WR; Hinds PS; Hays RD; Greenhalgh J; Gershon R; Feeny D; Fayers PM; Cella D; Brundage M; Ahmed S; Aaronson NK; Butt Z Qual Life Res; 2013 Oct; 22(8):1889-905. PubMed ID: 23288613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: an ad hoc task force report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001. Acquadro C; Berzon R; Dubois D; Leidy NK; Marquis P; Revicki D; Rothman M; Value Health; 2003; 6(5):522-31. PubMed ID: 14627058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An introduction to comparative effectiveness research. Marko NF; Weil RJ Neurosurgery; 2012 Feb; 70(2):425-34; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 21849923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. VisualDecisionLinc: a visual analytics approach for comparative effectiveness-based clinical decision support in psychiatry. Mane KK; Bizon C; Schmitt C; Owen P; Burchett B; Pietrobon R; Gersing K J Biomed Inform; 2012 Feb; 45(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 21963813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pediatric patient-reported outcome instruments for research to support medical product labeling: report of the ISPOR PRO good research practices for the assessment of children and adolescents task force. Matza LS; Patrick DL; Riley AW; Alexander JJ; Rajmil L; Pleil AM; Bullinger M Value Health; 2013 Jun; 16(4):461-79. PubMed ID: 23796280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Some methodological points to consider when performing systematic reviews in comparative effectiveness research. Berlin JA; Cepeda MS Clin Trials; 2012 Feb; 9(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 22049086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementation research: a critical component of realizing the benefits of comparative effectiveness research. Atkins D; Kupersmith J Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e38-45. PubMed ID: 21184866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Including patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported resource-use questionnaires in studies. Bresnahan BW; Rundell SD Acad Radiol; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1129-37. PubMed ID: 25107865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A framework for assessing the value of diagnostic imaging in the era of comparative effectiveness research. Gazelle GS; Kessler L; Lee DW; McGinn T; Menzin J; Neumann PJ; van Amerongen D; White LA; Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):692-8. PubMed ID: 22095993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]