184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22923301)
1. Bayesian inference of signaling network topology in a cancer cell line.
Hill SM; Lu Y; Molina J; Heiser LM; Spellman PT; Speed TP; Gray JW; Mills GB; Mukherjee S
Bioinformatics; 2012 Nov; 28(21):2804-10. PubMed ID: 22923301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Network inference using steady-state data and Goldbeter-Koshland kinetics. [corrected].
Oates CJ; Hennessy BT; Lu Y; Mills GB; Mukherjee S
Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 28(18):2342-8. PubMed ID: 22815361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integrating biological knowledge into variable selection: an empirical Bayes approach with an application in cancer biology.
Hill SM; Neve RM; Bayani N; Kuo WL; Ziyad S; Spellman PT; Gray JW; Mukherjee S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 May; 13():94. PubMed ID: 22578440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An empirical Bayes approach to inferring large-scale gene association networks.
Schäfer J; Strimmer K
Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 21(6):754-64. PubMed ID: 15479708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Context Specificity in Causal Signaling Networks Revealed by Phosphoprotein Profiling.
Hill SM; Nesser NK; Johnson-Camacho K; Jeffress M; Johnson A; Boniface C; Spencer SE; Lu Y; Heiser LM; Lawrence Y; Pande NT; Korkola JE; Gray JW; Mills GB; Mukherjee S; Spellman PT
Cell Syst; 2017 Jan; 4(1):73-83.e10. PubMed ID: 28017544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Network inference using informative priors.
Mukherjee S; Speed TP
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Sep; 105(38):14313-8. PubMed ID: 18799736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel knowledge-driven systems biology approach for phenotype prediction upon genetic intervention.
Chang R; Shoemaker R; Wang W
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(5):1170-82. PubMed ID: 21282866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrating Bayesian variable selection with Modular Response Analysis to infer biochemical network topology.
Santra T; Kolch W; Kholodenko BN
BMC Syst Biol; 2013 Jul; 7():57. PubMed ID: 23829771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advances to Bayesian network inference for generating causal networks from observational biological data.
Yu J; Smith VA; Wang PP; Hartemink AJ; Jarvis ED
Bioinformatics; 2004 Dec; 20(18):3594-603. PubMed ID: 15284094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new dynamic Bayesian network (DBN) approach for identifying gene regulatory networks from time course microarray data.
Zou M; Conzen SD
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 21(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 15308537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimal structural inference of signaling pathways from unordered and overlapping gene sets.
Acharya LR; Judeh T; Wang G; Zhu D
Bioinformatics; 2012 Feb; 28(4):546-56. PubMed ID: 22199386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inference of Gene Regulatory Networks Using Bayesian Nonparametric Regression and Topology Information.
Fan Y; Wang X; Peng Q
Comput Math Methods Med; 2017; 2017():8307530. PubMed ID: 28133490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of signaling cross-talks contributing to acquired drug resistance in breast cancer cells by Bayesian statistical modeling.
Azad AK; Lawen A; Keith JM
BMC Syst Biol; 2015 Jan; 9():2. PubMed ID: 25599599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comprehensive statistical model for cell signaling.
Yörük E; Ochs MF; Geman D; Younes L
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(3):592-606. PubMed ID: 20855924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian Orthogonal Least Squares (BOLS) algorithm for reverse engineering of gene regulatory networks.
Kim CS
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 8():251. PubMed ID: 17626641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic deterministic effects propagation networks: learning signalling pathways from longitudinal protein array data.
Bender C; Henjes F; Fröhlich H; Wiemann S; Korf U; Beissbarth T
Bioinformatics; 2010 Sep; 26(18):i596-602. PubMed ID: 20823327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of branch length uncertainty on Bayesian posterior probabilities for phylogenetic hypotheses.
Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Sep; 24(9):2108-18. PubMed ID: 17636043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Expectation propagation for large scale Bayesian inference of non-linear molecular networks from perturbation data.
Narimani Z; Beigy H; Ahmad A; Masoudi-Nejad A; Fröhlich H
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171240. PubMed ID: 28166542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitivity and specificity of inferring genetic regulatory interactions from microarray experiments with dynamic Bayesian networks.
Husmeier D
Bioinformatics; 2003 Nov; 19(17):2271-82. PubMed ID: 14630656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of reverse engineering gene regulatory networks with relevance networks, graphical gaussian models and bayesian networks.
Werhli AV; Grzegorczyk M; Husmeier D
Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(20):2523-31. PubMed ID: 16844710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
