157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22924645)
1. Threshold detection of boar taint chemicals using parasitic wasps.
Olson D; Wäckers F; Haugen JE
J Food Sci; 2012 Oct; 77(10):S356-61. PubMed ID: 22924645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Boar taint detection using parasitoid biosensors.
Wäckers F; Olson D; Rains G; Lundby F; Haugen JE
J Food Sci; 2011; 76(1):S41-7. PubMed ID: 21535714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Different scalding techniques do not affect boar taint.
Mörlein D; Grave A; Sharifi AR; Bücking M; Wicke M
Meat Sci; 2012 Aug; 91(4):435-40. PubMed ID: 22445490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pig meat quality from entire males.
Lundström K; Matthews KR; Haugen JE
Animal; 2009 Nov; 3(11):1497-507. PubMed ID: 22444983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Revealing genetic relationships between compounds affecting boar taint and reproduction in pigs.
Grindflek E; Meuwissen TH; Aasmundstad T; Hamland H; Hansen MH; Nome T; Kent M; Torjesen P; Lien S
J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):680-92. PubMed ID: 21346135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic parameters for androstenone, skatole, indole, and human nose scores as measures of boar taint and their relationship with finishing traits.
Windig JJ; Mulder HA; Ten Napel J; Knol EF; Mathur PK; Crump RE
J Anim Sci; 2012 Jul; 90(7):2120-9. PubMed ID: 22247111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of entire males for pig meat in the European Union.
Bonneau M
Meat Sci; 1998; 49S1():S257-72. PubMed ID: 22060716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of various boar taint detection methods.
Aluwé M; Tuyttens FA; Bekaert KM; De Smet S; De Brabander DL; Millet S
Animal; 2012 Nov; 6(11):1868-77. PubMed ID: 22717070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A human nose scoring system for boar taint and its relationship with androstenone and skatole.
Mathur PK; ten Napel J; Bloemhof S; Heres L; Knol EF; Mulder HA
Meat Sci; 2012 Aug; 91(4):414-22. PubMed ID: 22436660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of quantitative trait loci for androstenone, skatole and boar taint in a cross between Large White and Meishan pigs.
Lee GJ; Archibald AL; Law AS; Lloyd S; Wood J; Haley CS
Anim Genet; 2005 Feb; 36(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 15670126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acceptability of entire male pork with various levels of androstenone and skatole by consumers according to their sensitivity to androstenone.
Bonneau M; Chevillon P
Meat Sci; 2012 Feb; 90(2):330-7. PubMed ID: 21862238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breed differences in boar taint: relationship between tissue levels boar taint compounds and sensory analysis of taint.
Xue J; Dial GD; Holton EE; Vickers Z; Squires EJ; Lou Y; Godbout D; Morel N
J Anim Sci; 1996 Sep; 74(9):2170-7. PubMed ID: 8880419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of heating methods and the use of different tissues for sensory assessment of abnormal odours (boar taint) in pig meat.
Whittington FM; Zammerini D; Nute GR; Baker A; Hughes SI; Wood JD
Meat Sci; 2011 Jun; 88(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 21251766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing the length of time between slaughter and the secondary gonadotropin-releasing factor immunization improves growth performance and clears boar taint compounds in male finishing pigs.
Lealiifano AK; Pluske JR; Nicholls RR; Dunshea FR; Campbell RG; Hennessy DP; Miller DW; Hansen CF; Mullan BP
J Anim Sci; 2011 Sep; 89(9):2782-92. PubMed ID: 21512121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of method of castration, rearing condition and diet on sensory quality of pork assessed by a trained panel.
Pauly C; Spring-Staehli P; O'Doherty JV; Kragten SA; Dubois S; Messadène J; Bee G
Meat Sci; 2010 Oct; 86(2):498-504. PubMed ID: 20580494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An international study on the importance of androstenone and skatole for boar taint: I. Presentation of the programme and measurement of boar taint compounds with different analytical procedures.
Bonneau M; Kempster AJ; Claus R; Claudi-Magnussen C; Diestre A; Tornberg E; Walstra P; Chevillon P; Weiler U; Cook GL
Meat Sci; 2000 Mar; 54(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 22060695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting the likelihood of developing boar taint: early physical indicators in entire male pigs.
Bekaert KM; Aluwé M; Millet S; Goethals K; Nijs G; Isebaert S; De Brabander DL; Verheyden K; De Brabander HF; Vanhaecke L; Tuyttens FA
Meat Sci; 2012 Dec; 92(4):382-5. PubMed ID: 22664053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of soiling on boar taint in boars.
Aluwé M; Bekaert KM; Tuyttens FA; Vanhaecke L; De Smet S; De Brabander HF; De Brabander DL; Millet S
Meat Sci; 2011 Mar; 87(3):175-9. PubMed ID: 21074948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and validation of a classification model for boar taint detection in pork fat samples.
Rodrigues A; Massenet T; Dubois LM; Huet AC; Markey A; Wavreille J; Gengler N; Stefanuto PH; Focant JF
Food Chem; 2024 Jun; 443():138572. PubMed ID: 38295570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Consumer studies on sensory acceptability of boar taint: a review.
Font-i-Furnols M
Meat Sci; 2012 Dec; 92(4):319-29. PubMed ID: 22682684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
