BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22924959)

  • 1. Real-time fit of a respirator during simulated health care tasks.
    Hauge J; Roe M; Brosseau LM; Colton C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(10):563-71. PubMed ID: 22924959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.
    Lawrence RB; Duling MG; Calvert CA; Coffey CC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):465-74. PubMed ID: 16857645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulated workplace protection factors for half-facepiece respiratory protective devices.
    Duling MG; Lawrence RB; Slaven JE; Coffey CC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jun; 4(6):420-31. PubMed ID: 17474032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are quantitative fit factors predictive of respirator fit during simulated healthcare activities?
    Sietsema M; Brosseau LM
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Dec; 15(12):803-809. PubMed ID: 30142034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fitting characteristics of eighteen N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
    Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Campbell DL; Zhuang Z; Calvert CA; Jensen PA
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Apr; 1(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 15204866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of subject characteristics and respirator features on respirator fit.
    Zhuang Z; Coffey CC; Ann RB
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Dec; 2(12):641-9. PubMed ID: 16298949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Respirator Performance against Nanoparticles under Simulated Workplace Activities.
    Vo E; Zhuang Z; Horvatin M; Liu Y; He X; Rengasamy S
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 Oct; 59(8):1012-21. PubMed ID: 26180261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing real-time performances of N95 respirators for health care workers by simulated workplace protection factors.
    Kim H; Baek JE; Seo HK; Lee JE; Myong JP; Lee SJ; Lee JH
    Ind Health; 2015; 53(6):553-61. PubMed ID: 26320728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fit testing respirators for public health medical emergencies.
    Brosseau LM
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Nov; 7(11):628-32. PubMed ID: 20853203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A technique to measure respirator protection factors against aerosol particles in simulated workplace settings using portable instruments.
    Vo E; Horvatin M; Bergman M; Wu B; Zhuang Z
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2020 May; 17(5):231-242. PubMed ID: 32243774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Capability of respirator wearers to detect aerosolized qualitative fit test agents (sweetener and Bitrex) with known fixed leaks.
    McKay RT; Davies E
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Jun; 15(6):479-84. PubMed ID: 10853288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of five methods for fit-testing N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
    Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Zhuang Z; Campbell DL; Jensen PA; Myers WR
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Oct; 17(10):723-30. PubMed ID: 12363214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of two quantitative fit-test methods using N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
    Sietsema M; Brosseau LM
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016 Aug; 13(8):621-7. PubMed ID: 26963561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the benefit of the user seal check on N95 filtering facepiece respirator fit.
    Viscusi DJ; Bergman MS; Zhuang Z; Shaffer RE
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(6):408-16. PubMed ID: 22606976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health care workers and respiratory protection: is the user seal check a surrogate for respirator fit-testing?
    Danyluk Q; Hon CY; Neudorf M; Yassi A; Bryce E; Janssen B; Astrakianakis G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 May; 8(5):267-70. PubMed ID: 21462067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Respiratory protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: quantitative fit test outcomes for five type N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
    Lee K; Slavcev A; Nicas M
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jan; 1(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 15202153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Workplace protection factors for an N95 filtering facepiece respirator.
    Janssen LL; Nelson TJ; Cuta KT
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Sep; 4(9):698-707. PubMed ID: 17654225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between quantitative fit factors and workplace protection factors measured in actual workplace environments at a steel foundry.
    Zhuang Z; Coffey CC; Jensen PA; Campbell DL; Lawrence RB; Myers WR
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(6):730-8. PubMed ID: 14674806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of fit testing on the protection offered by n95 filtering facepiece respirators against fine particles in a laboratory setting.
    Reponen T; Lee SA; Grinshpun SA; Johnson E; McKay R
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Apr; 55(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 21177265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Particulate face masks for protection against airborne pathogens - one size does not fit all: an observational study.
    Winter S; Thomas JH; Stephens DP; Davis JS
    Crit Care Resusc; 2010 Mar; 12(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 20196710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.