192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22924959)
41. Performance of a full facepiece, air-purifying respirator against lead aerosols in a workplace environment.
Janssen L; Bidwell J
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Feb; 4(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 17175515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Evaluation of sampling probes for fit testing n95 filtering facepiece respirators.
Bergman MS; Viscusi DJ; Zhuang Z; Newcomb WE
Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 May; 57(4):507-18. PubMed ID: 23258452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Laboratory and field evaluation of a new personal sampling system for assessing the protection provided by the N95 filtering facepiece respirators against particles.
Lee SA; Grinshpun SA; Adhikari A; Li W; McKay R; Maynard A; Reponen T
Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Apr; 49(3):245-57. PubMed ID: 15668259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Protection of firefighters against combustion aerosol particles: simulated workplace protection factor of a half-mask respirator (pilot study).
Dietrich J; Yermakov M; Reponen T; Kulkarni P; Qi C; Grinshpun SA
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(6):415-20. PubMed ID: 25625543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Correlation between respirator fit and respirator fit test panel cells by respirator size.
Zhuang Z; Groce D; Ahlers HW; Iskander W; Landsittel D; Guffey S; Benson S; Viscusi D; Shaffer RE
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Oct; 5(10):617-28. PubMed ID: 18666022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Integrated unit performance testing of powered, air-purifying particulate respirators using a DOP challenge aerosol.
Martin S; Moyer E; Jensen P
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Nov; 3(11):631-41. PubMed ID: 17086668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluation of the filtration performance of NIOSH-approved N95 filtering facepiece respirators by photometric and number-based test methods.
Rengasamy S; Miller A; Eimer BC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Jan; 8(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 21154105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A novel approach to fit testing the N95 respirator in real time in a clinical setting.
Or P; Chung J; Wong T
Int J Nurs Pract; 2016 Feb; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 24828795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Determination of known exhalation valve damage using a negative pressure user seal check method on full facepiece respirators.
Delaney LJ; McKay RT; Freeman A
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Apr; 18(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 12637234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Impact of multiple consecutive donnings on filtering facepiece respirator fit.
Bergman MS; Viscusi DJ; Zhuang Z; Palmiero AJ; Powell JB; Shaffer RE
Am J Infect Control; 2012 May; 40(4):375-80. PubMed ID: 21864945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The effects of strapped spectacles on the fit factors of three manufactured brands of full facepiece negative pressure respirators.
Spear TM; Hardgrove R; Norman JB; Wulf DT; Rossi RJ
Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Apr; 43(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 10366899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Performance of two respiratory protective devices used by home-attending health care workers (a pilot study).
Elmashae RBY; Grinshpun SA; Reponen T; Yermakov M; Riddle R
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Sep; 14(9):D145-D149. PubMed ID: 28585893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of qualitative and quantitative fit-testing results for three commonly used respirators in the healthcare sector.
Hon CY; Danyluk Q; Bryce E; Janssen B; Neudorf M; Yassi A; Shen H; Astrakianakis G
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Mar; 14(3):175-179. PubMed ID: 27717300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Respiratory source control versus receiver protection: impact of facemask fit.
Mansour MM; Smaldone GC
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2013 Jun; 26(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 23544951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. New respirator fit test panels representing the current U.S. civilian work force.
Zhuang Z; Bradtmiller B; Shaffer RE
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Sep; 4(9):647-59. PubMed ID: 17613722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. N95-companion measurement of cout/cin ratios for two n95 filtering facepiece respirators and one surgical mask.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(10):527-32. PubMed ID: 23984654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Total inward leakage of nanoparticles through filtering facepiece respirators.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Apr; 55(3):253-63. PubMed ID: 21292731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Manikin-based performance evaluation of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators challenged with nanoparticles.
Balazy A; Toivola M; Reponen T; Podgórski A; Zimmer A; Grinshpun SA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Apr; 50(3):259-69. PubMed ID: 16344291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A new sampling technique that allows quantitative fit testing by using the employee's own respirator.
Johnson BR; Bjork KA; Weed JB
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Dec; 53(12):776-9. PubMed ID: 1471599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Evaluation of a quantitative fit testing method for N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
Janssen L; Luinenburg MD; Mullins HE; Danisch SG; Nelson TJ
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 12908863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
