177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22925080)
1. Unifying cornerstones of sexual selection: operational sex ratio, Bateman gradient and the scope for competitive investment.
Kokko H; Klug H; Jennions MD
Ecol Lett; 2012 Nov; 15(11):1340-1351. PubMed ID: 22925080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Operational sex ratio predicts the opportunity and direction of sexual selection across animals.
Janicke T; Morrow EH
Ecol Lett; 2018 Mar; 21(3):384-391. PubMed ID: 29341415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mate choice and the operational sex ratio: an experimental test with robotic crabs.
Hayes CL; Callander S; Booksmythe I; Jennions MD; Backwell PR
J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1455-61. PubMed ID: 27087241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bateman gradients reflect variation in sexual selection in a species with dynamic sex roles.
Hare RM; Simmons LW
J Evol Biol; 2022 Sep; 35(9):1206-1217. PubMed ID: 35932479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling.
Kokko H; Johnstone RA
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2002 Mar; 357(1419):319-30. PubMed ID: 11958700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Operational sex ratio but not density affects sexual selection in a fish.
Wacker S; Mobley K; Forsgren E; Myhre LC; de Jong K; Amundsen T
Evolution; 2013 Jul; 67(7):1937-49. PubMed ID: 23815651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sexual selection on male body size, genital length and heterozygosity: Consistency across habitats and social settings.
Head ML; Kahn AT; Henshaw JM; Keogh JS; Jennions MD
J Anim Ecol; 2017 Oct; 86(6):1458-1468. PubMed ID: 28815592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Within-season variation in sexual selection in a fish with dynamic sex roles.
Wacker S; Amundsen T; Forsgren E; Mobley KB
Mol Ecol; 2014 Jul; 23(14):3587-99. PubMed ID: 24917383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bateman in nature: predation on offspring reduces the potential for sexual selection.
Byers J; Dunn S
Science; 2012 Nov; 338(6108):802-4. PubMed ID: 23139332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios.
Kokko H; Jennions MD
J Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 21(4):919-48. PubMed ID: 18462318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the opportunity for sexual selection, the Bateman gradient and the maximum intensity of sexual selection.
Jones AG
Evolution; 2009 Jul; 63(7):1673-84. PubMed ID: 19228185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The opportunity to be misled in studies of sexual selection.
Jennions MD; Kokko H; Klug H
J Evol Biol; 2012 Mar; 25(3):591-8. PubMed ID: 22268720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bateman gradients in hermaphrodites: an extended approach to quantify sexual selection.
Anthes N; David P; Auld JR; Hoffer JN; Jarne P; Koene JM; Kokko H; Lorenzi MC; Pélissié B; Sprenger D; Staikou A; Schärer L
Am Nat; 2010 Sep; 176(3):249-63. PubMed ID: 20636132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sex ratio and density affect sexual selection in a sex-role reversed fish.
Aronsen T; Berglund A; Mobley KB; Ratikainen II; Rosenqvist G
Evolution; 2013 Nov; 67(11):3243-57. PubMed ID: 24152006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of operational sex ratio on the intensity of competition for mates.
Weir LK; Grant JW; Hutchings JA
Am Nat; 2011 Feb; 177(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 21460553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mating System, Reproductive Success, and Sexual Selection in Bluntnose Klipfishes (Clinus cottoides).
Scheepers MJ; Gouws G
J Hered; 2019 May; 110(3):351-360. PubMed ID: 30726981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Not all sex ratios are equal: the Fisher condition, parental care and sexual selection.
Jennions MD; Fromhage L
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2017 Sep; 372(1729):. PubMed ID: 28760755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Homage to Bateman: sex roles predict sex differences in sexual selection.
Fritzsche K; Arnqvis G
Evolution; 2013 Jul; 67(7):1926-36. PubMed ID: 23815650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic versus census estimators of the opportunity for sexual selection in the wild.
Dunn SJ; Waits LP; Byers JA
Am Nat; 2012 Apr; 179(4):451-62. PubMed ID: 22437175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The mismeasurement of sexual selection.
Klug H; Heuschele J; Jennions MD; Kokko H
J Evol Biol; 2010 Mar; 23(3):447-62. PubMed ID: 20088870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
