177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22925080)
21. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
Fedina TY; Lewis SM
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Operational sex ratio and density do not affect directional selection on male sexual ornaments and behavior.
Head ML; Lindholm AK; Brooks R
Evolution; 2008 Jan; 62(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 18067568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Terminal Investment Strategies and Male Mate choice: Extreme Tests of Bateman.
Andrade MC; Kasumovic MM
Integr Comp Biol; 2005 Nov; 45(5):838-47. PubMed ID: 21676835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bateman's principle is reversed in a cooperatively breeding bird.
Apakupakul K; Rubenstein DR
Biol Lett; 2015 Apr; 11(4):20150034. PubMed ID: 25904321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Adult sex ratio variation: implications for breeding system evolution.
Székely T; Weissing FJ; Komdeur J
J Evol Biol; 2014 Aug; 27(8):1500-12. PubMed ID: 24848871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Inconsistency between different measures of sexual selection.
Fitze PS; Le Galliard JF
Am Nat; 2011 Aug; 178(2):256-68. PubMed ID: 21750388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish.
Jones AG; Rosenqvist G; Berglund A; Arnold SJ; Avise JC
Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Apr; 267(1444):677-80. PubMed ID: 10821612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantitative measure of sexual selection with respect to the operational sex ratio: a comparison of selection indices.
Mills SC; Grapputo A; Koskela E; Mappes T
Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Jan; 274(1606):143-50. PubMed ID: 17134998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sexual selection determines parental care patterns in cichlid fishes.
Gonzalez-Voyer A; Fitzpatrick JL; Kolm N
Evolution; 2008 Aug; 62(8):2015-26. PubMed ID: 18489718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Molecular parentage analysis in experimental newt populations: the response of mating system measures to variation in the operational sex ratio.
Jones AG; Arguello JR; Arnold SJ
Am Nat; 2004 Oct; 164(4):444-56. PubMed ID: 15459877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of social and extra-pair mating on sexual selection in blue tits (cyanistes caeruleus).
Schlicht E; Kempenaers B
Evolution; 2013 May; 67(5):1420-34. PubMed ID: 23617918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cryptic sex-ratio bias provides indirect genetic benefits despite sexual conflict.
Cox RM; Calsbeek R
Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5974):92-4. PubMed ID: 20203012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
Neff BD; Pitcher TE
Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Timing as a sexually selected trait: the right mate at the right moment.
Hau M; Dominoni D; Casagrande S; Buck CL; Wagner G; Hazlerigg D; Greives T; Hut RA
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2017 Nov; 372(1734):. PubMed ID: 28993493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. How to quantify (the response to) sexual selection on traits.
Henshaw JM; Jennions MD; Kruuk LEB
Evolution; 2018 Sep; 72(9):1904-1917. PubMed ID: 30004126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Geographical variation in the mating system of the dusky pipefish (Syngnathus floridae).
Mobley KB; Jones AG
Mol Ecol; 2007 Jun; 16(12):2596-606. PubMed ID: 17561916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Density-dependent selection on mate search and evolution of Allee effects.
Berec L; Kramer AM; Bernhauerová V; Drake JM
J Anim Ecol; 2018 Jan; 87(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 28240356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Temporal variation in size-assortative mating and male mate choice in a spider with amphisexual care.
Moura RR; Gonzaga MO
Naturwissenschaften; 2017 Apr; 104(3-4):28. PubMed ID: 28289773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Operational sex ratio, sexual conflict and the intensity of sexual selection.
Fitze PS; Le Galliard JF
Ecol Lett; 2008 May; 11(5):432-9. PubMed ID: 18279355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A rigorous comparison of sexual selection indexes via simulations of diverse mating systems.
Henshaw JM; Kahn AT; Fritzsche K
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jan; 113(3):E300-8. PubMed ID: 26739567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
