These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22925256)

  • 1. Re: Humphreys et al.: natural orifice transluminal endoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial perioperative and pathologic results (urology 2011;78:1211-1218).
    Jeong CW; Lee SE; Kim HH
    Urology; 2012 Sep; 80(3):743-4; author reply 744-5. PubMed ID: 22925256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Re: Humphreys et al. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial perioperative and pathologic results (Urology 2011;78:1211-1217).
    Nagathan D; Goel A; Goyal NK
    Urology; 2012 Nov; 80(5):1167-8; author reply 1168. PubMed ID: 23107407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial perioperative and pathologic results.
    Humphreys MR; Sauer JS; Ryan AR; Leslie KO; Castle EP; Lingeman JE; Andrews PE
    Urology; 2011 Dec; 78(6):1211-7. PubMed ID: 21996106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Editorial comment.
    Kavoussi LR
    Urology; 2011 Dec; 78(6):1217; author reply 1217-8. PubMed ID: 22137688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic radical prostatectomy (NOTES RP): the evolution of the technique.
    Humphreys MR; Castle EP; Andrews PE
    Arch Esp Urol; 2012 Apr; 65(3):407-14. PubMed ID: 22495282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re: Intraoperative frozen section monitoring of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Goldstein NS
    J Urol; 2000 Apr; 163(4):1260. PubMed ID: 10737523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Re: The Impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis.
    Taneja SS
    J Urol; 2015 May; 193(5):1539-40. PubMed ID: 25895762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The application of natural orifice surgery for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
    Duty B; Roy O; Micali S; Richstone L; Vira M; Schwartz M; Kavoussi L
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 21555103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Current status of natural orifice trans-endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) in urologic surgery.
    Sanchez-Salas RE; Barret E; Watson J; Stakhovskyi O; Cathelineau X; Rozet F; Galiano M; Rane A; Desai MM; Sotelo R; Vallancien G
    Int Braz J Urol; 2010; 36(4):385-400. PubMed ID: 20815945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re: Williams et al.: Radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: likelihood of positive surgical margin(s) (Urology 2010;76:1097-1101).
    Soloway MS
    Urology; 2011 Jan; 77(1):263-4. PubMed ID: 21195861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Natural orifice transendoluminal surgery and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: the future of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Barret E; Sanchez-Salas R; Ercolani MC; Rozet F; Galiano M; Cathelineau X
    Future Oncol; 2011 Mar; 7(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 21417905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Radical prostatectomy. Calculation of the tumoral volume apropos of 40 cases and review of the literature].
    Boran-Devouassous MS
    Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1994; 42(1):63-4. PubMed ID: 8074552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Re: Williams et al.: Radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: likelihood of positive surgical margin(s) (Urology 2010;76:1097-1101).
    Guillonneau B
    Urology; 2011 Jan; 77(1):262-3; author reply 263-4. PubMed ID: 21195859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy and cystectomy with the aid of a transurethral port: a feasibility study.
    Su J; Zhu Q; Yuan L; Zhang Y; Zhang Q; Wei Y
    BJU Int; 2018 Jan; 121(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 28734080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Radical prostatectomy--experience with 50 patients].
    Goldwasser B; Mor Y; Nativ O; Leibovitch I
    Harefuah; 1992 Dec; 123(12):509-12, 572. PubMed ID: 1289194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy: technical difficulties due to a large median lobe.
    Sarle R; Tewari A; Hemal AK; Menon M
    Urol Int; 2005; 74(1):92-4. PubMed ID: 15711118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Raboy A; Ferzli G; Albert P
    Urology; 1997 Dec; 50(6):849-53. PubMed ID: 9426712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Case study: management of lymph node-positive disease detected at radical prostatectomy.
    Kirby R
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2005; 8(3):287-9. PubMed ID: 15940288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: a comparison between retropubic and laparoscopic surgery.
    Silva E; Ferreira U; Silva GD; Mariano MB; Netto NR; Billis A; Magna LA
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2007; 39(3):865-9. PubMed ID: 17357823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. No residual cancer on radical prostatectomy.
    López JI
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Dec; 130(12):1752; author reply 1752-3. PubMed ID: 17149941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.