325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22925598)
1. Planning target volume margin evaluation and critical structure sparing for rectal cancer patients treated prone on a bellyboard.
Cranmer-Sargison G; Kundapur V; Park-Somers E; Andreas J; Vachhrajani H; Sidhu NP
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2013 Mar; 25(3):e17-22. PubMed ID: 22925598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptive radiotherapy and the dosimetric impact of inter- and intrafractional motion on the planning target volume for prostate cancer patients.
Böckelmann F; Putz F; Kallis K; Lettmaier S; Fietkau R; Bert C
Strahlenther Onkol; 2020 Jul; 196(7):647-656. PubMed ID: 32157345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical implementation of an online adaptive plan-of-the-day protocol for nonrigid motion management in locally advanced cervical cancer IMRT.
Heijkoop ST; Langerak TR; Quint S; Bondar L; Mens JW; Heijmen BJ; Hoogeman MS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Nov; 90(3):673-9. PubMed ID: 25151538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of planning target volume margin for a small number of vertebral metastatic lesions using image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy by helical tomotherapy.
Nishimura T; Yamazaki H; Iwama K; Kotani T; Oota Y; Aibe H; Nakamura S; Ikeno H; Yoshida K; Isohashi F; Okabe H
Anticancer Res; 2013 Jun; 33(6):2453-6. PubMed ID: 23749895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What is the Best Way to Plan Rectum Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy in Prone Position-Classic Anatomical Landmark, Three Dimensional Fitting the Planning Target Volume, or Volumetric Modulated Arc?
Kundel Y; Ben Hur R; Shochat Z; Stanislav Z; Fenig E; Brenner B; Popovtzer A
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2020 Mar; 51(1):103-107. PubMed ID: 32067961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric influences of rotational setup errors on head and neck carcinoma intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments.
Fu W; Yang Y; Yue NJ; Heron DE; Saiful Huq M
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 23266161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic and prostate cancer using pulsed low-dose rate delivery techniques.
Li J; Lang J; Wang P; Kang S; Lin MH; Chen X; Chen F; Guo M; Chen L; Ma CM
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 25087084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An image-guided study of setup reproducibility of postmastectomy breast cancer patients treated with inverse-planned intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Feng CH; Gerry E; Chmura SJ; Hasan Y; Al-Hallaq HA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jan; 91(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 25442344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of different set-up error corrections on dose-volume metrics in prostate IMRT using CBCT images.
Hirose Y; Nakamura M; Tomita T; Kitsuda K; Notogawa T; Miki K; Nakamura K; Ishigaki T
J Radiat Res; 2014 Sep; 55(5):966-75. PubMed ID: 24820094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PTV margin analysis for prostate patients treated with initial pelvic nodal IMRT and prostate proton boost.
Su Z; Li Z; Henderson R; Hoppe B; Nichols RC; Bryant C; Mendenhall W; Mendenhall N
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 64(4):04NT04. PubMed ID: 30630135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental validation of the van Herk margin formula for lung radiation therapy.
Ecclestone G; Bissonnette JP; Heath E
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111721. PubMed ID: 24320429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric effects of the prone and supine positions on image guided localized prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Liu B; Lerma FA; Patel S; Amin P; Feng Y; Yi BY; Yu C
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 18207595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of position and radiation technique on organs at risk in radiotherapy of rectal cancer.
Wang JF; Li H; Xiong H; Huang H; Zou YM
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2016 Oct; 36(5):741-746. PubMed ID: 27752904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of online/offline image guidance/adaptation approaches for prostate cancer radiation therapy.
Qin A; Sun Y; Liang J; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Apr; 91(5):1026-33. PubMed ID: 25832693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Adaptive IG-IMRT for prostate cancer].
Vanásek J; Odrázka K; Dolezel M; Kolárová I
Klin Onkol; 2011; 24(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 22070018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interfraction positional variation in pancreatic tumors using daily breath-hold cone-beam computed tomography with visual feedback.
Nakamura M; Akimoto M; Ono T; Nakamura A; Yano S; Nakata M; Itasaka S; Mizowaki T; Shibuya K; Hiraoka M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):5123. PubMed ID: 26103180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 4DCT and CBCT based PTV margin in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy(SBRT) of non-small cell lung tumor adhered to chest wall or diaphragm.
Li Y; Ma JL; Chen X; Tang FW; Zhang XZ
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Nov; 11(1):152. PubMed ID: 27846900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Superiority of a soft tissue-based setup using cone-beam computed tomography over a bony structure-based setup in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Sato H; Abe E; Utsunomiya S; Kaidu M; Yamana N; Tanaka K; Ohta A; Obinata M; Liu J; Kawaguchi G; Maruyama K; Ayukawa F; Aoyama H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):239–245. PubMed ID: 26699304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
