These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22925852)

  • 1. Odour emission ability (OEA) and its application in assessing odour removal efficiency.
    Wang X; Parcsi G; Sivret E; Le H; Wang B; Stuetz RM
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(9):1828-33. PubMed ID: 22925852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Control of odour emission in wastewater treatment plants by direct and undirected measurement of odour emission capacity.
    Zarra T; Giuliani S; Naddeo V; Belgiorno V
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(8):1627-33. PubMed ID: 22907444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Odour impact assessment using kinetics and optimization: case studies on removal of multiple volatile organo-sulphur compounds from sewage wastewater using porous functional materials.
    Jana S; Basu S; Sarkar U
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Dec; 195(1):226. PubMed ID: 36562856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Odour assessment: determining the optimum temperature and time for Tedlar sampling bag pre-conditioning.
    Bokowa AH
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(8):1806-11. PubMed ID: 22907469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aerodynamic performance of a low-speed wind tunnel.
    Frechen FB; Frey M; Wett M; Löser C
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):57-64. PubMed ID: 15484743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Odour emission inventory of German wastewater treatment plants--odour flow rates and odour emission capacity.
    Frechen FB
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):139-46. PubMed ID: 15484754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias of Tedlar bags in the measurement of agricultural odorants.
    Trabue SL; Anhalt JC; Zahn JA
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(5):1668-77. PubMed ID: 16899738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a novel wind tunnel for the measurement of the kinetics of odour emissions from piggery effluent.
    Sohn JH; Smith R; Yoong E; Hudson N; Kim TI
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):49-55. PubMed ID: 15484742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monitoring techniques for odour abatement assessment.
    Muñoz R; Sivret EC; Parcsi G; Lebrero R; Wang X; Suffet IH; Stuetz RM
    Water Res; 2010 Oct; 44(18):5129-49. PubMed ID: 20696458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New compact scrubber for odour removal in wastewater treatment plants.
    Sanchez C; Couvert A; Laplanche A; Renner C
    Water Sci Technol; 2006; 54(9):45-52. PubMed ID: 17163041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Odour sampling. 2. Comparison of physical and aerodynamic characteristics of sampling devices: a review.
    Hudson N; Ayoko GA
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jul; 99(10):3993-4007. PubMed ID: 17512194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing odorants recovery from a novel metallized fluorinated ethylene propylene gas sampling bag.
    Zhu W; Koziel JA; Cai L; Wright D; Kuhrt F
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Dec; 65(12):1434-45. PubMed ID: 26453185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of a diagnostic tool: the wastewater collection network odour wheel.
    Decottignies V; Huyard A; Kelly RF; Barillon B
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(4):839-47. PubMed ID: 23985514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Personal and ambient exposures to air toxics in Camden, New Jersey.
    Lioy PJ; Fan Z; Zhang J; Georgopoulos P; Wang SW; Ohman-Strickland P; Wu X; Zhu X; Harrington J; Tang X; Meng Q; Jung KH; Kwon J; Hernandez M; Bonnano L; Held J; Neal J;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Aug; (160):3-127; discussion 129-51. PubMed ID: 22097188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of odour emission rates measured from various sources using two sampling devices.
    Hudson N; Ayoko GA; Dunlop M; Duperouzel D; Burrell D; Bell K; Gallagher E; Nicholas P; Heinrich N
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Jan; 100(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 18625551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modelling to assist in wastewater collection system odour and corrosion potential evaluations.
    Witherspoon J; Allen E; Quigley C
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 15484759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of different measurement methods of odour and odorants used in the odour impact assessment of wastewater treatment plants in Poland.
    Barczak RJ; Kulig A
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 75(3-4):944-951. PubMed ID: 28234294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design and validation of a wind tunnel system for odour sampling on liquid area sources.
    Capelli L; Sironi S; Del Rosso R; Céntola P
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(8):1611-20. PubMed ID: 19403975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing odour nuisance from wastewater treatment and composting facilities in Greece.
    Lasaridi K; Katsabanis G; Kyriacou A; Maggos T; Manios T; Fountoulakis M; Kalogerakis N; Karageorgos P; Stentiford EI
    Waste Manag Res; 2010 Nov; 28(11):977-84. PubMed ID: 20522490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A critical review on liquid-gas mass transfer models for estimating gaseous emissions from passive liquid surfaces in wastewater treatment plants.
    Prata AA; Santos JM; Timchenko V; Stuetz RM
    Water Res; 2018 Mar; 130():388-406. PubMed ID: 29258050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.