These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22925864)

  • 1. Performance evaluation and effect of biogas circulation rate of a bubble column for biological desulfurization.
    Kobayashi T; Xu KQ; Li YY; Inamori Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(9):1914-22. PubMed ID: 22925864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effect of the ratio of height to diameter on the performance of the simultaneous reactor for nitrogen removal from swine wastewater and sulfide removal from biogas].
    Sun Z; Wu J; Pu XD; Deng LW
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2010 Sep; 31(9):2214-9. PubMed ID: 21072949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biogas desulfurization using autotrophic denitrification process.
    Bayrakdar A; Tilahun E; Calli B
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2016 Jan; 100(2):939-48. PubMed ID: 26428238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancing the removal of H
    Jiang X; Wu J; Jin Z; Yang S; Shen L
    Bioresour Technol; 2020 Mar; 299():122621. PubMed ID: 31877481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Design and scale-up of an oxidative scrubbing process for the selective removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas.
    Krischan J; Makaruk A; Harasek M
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 May; 215-216():49-56. PubMed ID: 22440540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance and characterization of a newly developed self-agitated anaerobic reactor with biological desulfurization.
    Kobayashi T; Li YY
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 May; 102(10):5580-8. PubMed ID: 21398119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hydrogen sulfide removal from livestock biogas by a farm-scale bio-filter desulfurization system.
    Su JJ; Chang YC; Chen YJ; Chang KC; Lee SY
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(6):1288-93. PubMed ID: 23508153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Operational aspects of the desulfurization process of energy gases mimics in biotrickling filters.
    Fortuny M; Gamisans X; Deshusses MA; Lafuente J; Casas C; Gabriel D
    Water Res; 2011 Nov; 45(17):5665-74. PubMed ID: 21890165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a novel process for the biological conversion of H2S and methanethiol to elemental sulfur.
    Sipma J; Janssen AJ; Pol LW; Lettinga G
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 Apr; 82(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 12569619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Autotrophic denitrification for combined hydrogen sulfide removal from biogas and post-denitrification.
    Kleerebezem R; Mendez R
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(10):349-56. PubMed ID: 12188569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biological oxidation of hydrogen sulfide in mineral media using a biofilm airlift suspension reactor.
    Moghanloo GM; Fatehifar E; Saedy S; Aghaeifar Z; Abbasnezhad H
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Nov; 101(21):8330-5. PubMed ID: 20594822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of S/N Ratio on the Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide from Biogas in Anoxic Bioreactors.
    Li X; Jiang X; Zhou Q; Jiang W
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2016 Nov; 180(5):930-944. PubMed ID: 27215914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robustness of the microaerobic removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas.
    Díaz I; Fdz-Polanco M
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(8):1368-74. PubMed ID: 22466581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microbiological removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas by means of a separate biofilter system: experience with technical operation.
    Schieder D; Quicker P; Schneider R; Winter H; Prechtl S; Faulstich M
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(4):209-12. PubMed ID: 14531443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Where does the removal of H₂S from biogas occur in microaerobic reactors?
    Ramos I; Peña M; Fdz-Polanco M
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 166():151-7. PubMed ID: 24907574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Co-digestion of sewage sludge with glycerol to boost biogas production.
    Fountoulakis MS; Petousi I; Manios T
    Waste Manag; 2010 Oct; 30(10):1849-53. PubMed ID: 20434322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Operational aspects, pH transition and microbial shifts of a H2S desulfurizing biotrickling filter with random packing material.
    Montebello AM; Bezerra T; Rovira R; Rago L; Lafuente J; Gamisans X; Campoy S; Baeza M; Gabriel D
    Chemosphere; 2013 Nov; 93(11):2675-82. PubMed ID: 24041568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of the liquid upflow velocity on thermophilic sulphate reduction in acidifying granular sludge reactors.
    Lens PN; Korthout D; van Lier JB; Hulshoff Pol LW; Lettinga G
    Environ Technol; 2001 Feb; 22(2):183-93. PubMed ID: 11349377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel up-flow inner-cycle anoxic bioreactor (UIAB) system for the treatment of sulfide wastewater from purification of biogas.
    Song Z; Li Q; Wang D; Zhang J; Xing J
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(6):1033-40. PubMed ID: 22377999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.