320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22925922)
1. Patient satisfaction and masticatory efficiency of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the stud and magnetic attachments.
Cheng T; Sun G; Huo J; He X; Wang Y; Ren YF
J Dent; 2012 Nov; 40(11):1018-23. PubMed ID: 22925922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment.
Burns DR; Unger JW; Coffey JP; Waldrop TC; Elswick RK
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 21723989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.
Ellis JS; Burawi G; Walls A; Thomason JM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments: a crossover clinical trial.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Fazekas A; Ewers R; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1560-8. PubMed ID: 23189311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study.
Naert I; Alsaadi G; Quirynen M
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 15382775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-year clinical outcome of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures--results of preliminary prospective study.
Harder S; Wolfart S; Egert C; Kern M
J Dent; 2011 Oct; 39(10):656-61. PubMed ID: 21821093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with resilient liner and clip attachments for bar- and implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year randomized clinical study.
ELsyad MA
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 22371836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. OHRQoL, masticatory performance and crestal bone loss with single-implant, magnet-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional and shortened dental arch.
Grover M; Vaidyanathan AK; Veeravalli PT
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 23331716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mandibular overdentures stabilized by Astra Tech implants with either ball attachments or magnets: 5-year results.
Davis DM; Packer ME
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 10635189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of attachment type and implant number on satisfaction and quality of life of mandibular implant-retained overdenture wearers.
Mumcu E; Bilhan H; Geckili O
Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e618-23. PubMed ID: 21726276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Denture satisfaction in a comparative study of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a randomized clinical trial.
Geertman ME; van Waas MA; van 't Hof MA; Kalk W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 8666450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Patient satisfaction with different types of implant-retained overdentures in the edentate mandible].
Cune MS; van Kampen FM; van der Bilt A
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2006 Oct; 113(10):401-7. PubMed ID: 17058761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of mandibular implant-retained overdentures in masticatory efficiency.
Farias Neto A; Pereira BM; Xitara RL; Germano AR; Ribeiro JA; Mestriner Junior W; Carreiro Ada F
Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e650-5. PubMed ID: 21916952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Masticatory efficiency of implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with attachments compared with conventional dentures: an in vitro digital colorimetric image analysis.
Salami ZA; Jasser EM; Makzoumé JED; Boulos PJA
Gen Dent; 2020; 68(6):60-64. PubMed ID: 33136048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychometric Analysis and Masticatory Efficiency of Elderly People with Single-Implant Overdentures.
Amaral CF; Pinheiro MA; de Moraes M; Rodrigues Garcia RCM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1383-1389. PubMed ID: 30427971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A quality-of-life comparison between self-aligning and ball attachment systems for 2-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Bilhan H; Geckili O; Sulun T; Bilgin T
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():167-73. PubMed ID: 20662674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
