These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22925993)

  • 1. The accuracy of human senses in the detection of neonatal heart rate during standardized simulated resuscitation: implications for delivery of care, training and technology design.
    Chitkara R; Rajani AK; Oehlert JW; Lee HC; Epi MS; Halamek LP
    Resuscitation; 2013 Mar; 84(3):369-72. PubMed ID: 22925993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of clinical assessment of infant heart rate in the delivery room.
    Kamlin CO; O'Donnell CP; Everest NJ; Davis PG; Morley CJ
    Resuscitation; 2006 Dec; 71(3):319-21. PubMed ID: 16989935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomised, simulated study assessing auscultation of heart rate at birth.
    Voogdt KG; Morrison AC; Wood FE; van Elburg RM; Wyllie JP
    Resuscitation; 2010 Aug; 81(8):1000-3. PubMed ID: 20483522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Heart Rate Determination in Newborns at Risk for Resuscitation in a Low-Resource Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Cavallin F; Cori MS; Negash S; Azzimonti G; Vento G; Putoto G; Trevisanuto D
    J Pediatr; 2020 Jun; 221():88-92.e1. PubMed ID: 32222255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auscultate, palpate and tap: time to re-evaluate.
    Hawkes GA; Hawkes CP; Kenosi M; Demeulemeester J; Livingstone V; Ryan CA; Dempsey EM
    Acta Paediatr; 2016 Feb; 105(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 26317177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In situ simulation training for neonatal resuscitation: an RCT.
    Rubio-Gurung S; Putet G; Touzet S; Gauthier-Moulinier H; Jordan I; Beissel A; Labaune JM; Blanc S; Amamra N; Balandras C; Rudigoz RC; Colin C; Picaud JC
    Pediatrics; 2014 Sep; 134(3):e790-7. PubMed ID: 25092937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of different methods for heart rate determination during simulated neonatal resuscitations.
    Theophilopoulos DT; Burchfield DJ
    J Perinatol; 1998; 18(1):65-7. PubMed ID: 9527948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Who's counting? Assessing the effects of a simulation-based training intervention on the accuracy of neonatal heart rate auscultation.
    Money N; Kusheleva N; Ruano S; Demissie S; Blau J; Singhi V
    J Perinatol; 2019 May; 39(5):634-639. PubMed ID: 30770884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Heart rate assessment using NeoTapAdvancedSupport: a simulation study.
    Binotti M; Cavallin F; Ingrassia PL; Pejovic NJ; Monzani A; Genoni G; Trevisanuto D
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2019 Jul; 104(4):F440-F442. PubMed ID: 30262463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-fidelity simulator technology may not be superior to traditional low-fidelity equipment for neonatal resuscitation training.
    Finan E; Bismilla Z; Whyte HE; Leblanc V; McNamara PJ
    J Perinatol; 2012 Apr; 32(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 22031045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personalized oral debriefing versus standardized multimedia instruction after patient crisis simulation.
    Welke TM; LeBlanc VR; Savoldelli GL; Joo HS; Chandra DB; Crabtree NA; Naik VN
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Jul; 109(1):183-9. PubMed ID: 19535709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Team training in the neonatal resuscitation program for interns: teamwork and quality of resuscitations.
    Thomas EJ; Williams AL; Reichman EF; Lasky RE; Crandell S; Taggart WR
    Pediatrics; 2010 Mar; 125(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 20156896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of umbilical venous and intraosseous access during simulated neonatal resuscitation.
    Rajani AK; Chitkara R; Oehlert J; Halamek LP
    Pediatrics; 2011 Oct; 128(4):e954-8. PubMed ID: 21930542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of a mobile application for heart rate assessment in simulated neonatal resuscitation: a randomised controlled cross-over study.
    Cavallin F; Binotti M; Ingrassia PL; Genoni G; Rizzollo S; Monzani A; Trevisanuto D
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2020 Jan; 105(1):41-44. PubMed ID: 31101662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determining the pulse for infant CPR: time for a change?
    Lee CJ; Bullock LJ
    Mil Med; 1991 Apr; 156(4):190-3. PubMed ID: 2030841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of Standardized Communication Techniques on Errors during Simulated Neonatal Resuscitation.
    Yamada NK; Fuerch JH; Halamek LP
    Am J Perinatol; 2016 Mar; 33(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 26485251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heartbeat assessment in infants: a comparison of four clinical methods.
    Sarti A; Savron F; Casotto V; Cuttini M
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2005 Mar; 6(2):212-5. PubMed ID: 15730611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pulseless electrical activity: a misdiagnosed entity during asphyxia in newborn infants?
    Patel S; Cheung PY; Solevåg AL; Barrington KJ; Kamlin COF; Davis PG; Schmölzer GM
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2019 Mar; 104(2):F215-F217. PubMed ID: 29895572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variability in the assessment of 'adequate' chest excursion during simulated neonatal resuscitation.
    Brugada M; Schilleman K; Witlox RS; Walther FJ; Vento M; Te Pas AB
    Neonatology; 2011; 100(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 21311200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of a novel decision support tool on adherence to Neonatal Resuscitation Program algorithm.
    Fuerch JH; Yamada NK; Coelho PR; Lee HC; Halamek LP
    Resuscitation; 2015 Mar; 88():52-6. PubMed ID: 25555358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.