409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22926551)
1. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review.
Watanabe M; Baba Y; Nagai Y; Baba H
Surg Today; 2013 Mar; 43(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 22926551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy.
Thirunavukarasu P; Gabriel E; Attwood K; Kukar M; Hochwald SN; Nurkin SJ
Int J Surg; 2016 Jan; 25():69-75. PubMed ID: 26602969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review.
Koyanagi K; Ozawa S; Tachimori Y
Surg Today; 2016 Mar; 46(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 25860592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature.
Verhage RJ; Hazebroek EJ; Boone J; Van Hillegersberg R
Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 19365314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Achieving R0.
Darwish MB; Nagatomo K; Jackson T; Cho E; Osman H; Jeyarajah DR
JSLS; 2020; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 33414613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.
van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally Invasive
Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer?
Li J; Shen Y; Tan L; Feng M; Wang H; Xi Y; Wang Q
Surg Endosc; 2015 Apr; 29(4):925-30. PubMed ID: 25249141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
Weksler B; Sullivan JL
Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Kauppi J; Räsänen J; Sihvo E; Huuhtanen R; Nelskylä K; Salo J
Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2614-9. PubMed ID: 25480610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Postoperative short-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Akhtar NM; Chen D; Zhao Y; Dane D; Xue Y; Wang W; Zhang J; Sang Y; Chen C; Chen Y
Thorac Cancer; 2020 Jun; 11(6):1465-1475. PubMed ID: 32310341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Javidfar J; Bacchetta M; Yang JA; Miller J; D'Ovidio F; Ginsburg ME; Gorenstein LA; Bessler M; Sonett JR
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 22500593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of outcomes between minimally invasive oesophagectomy and open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.
Xiong WL; Li R; Lei HK; Jiang ZY
ANZ J Surg; 2017 Mar; 87(3):165-170. PubMed ID: 26477880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current status of minimally invasive esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer.
Takeuchi H; Kawakubo H; Kitagawa Y
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Sep; 61(9):513-21. PubMed ID: 23661109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case controlled study.
Schoppmann SF; Prager G; Langer FB; Riegler FM; Kabon B; Fleischmann E; Zacherl J
Surg Endosc; 2010 Dec; 24(12):3044-53. PubMed ID: 20464423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
