178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22927774)
1. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Japanese women.
Yokoi A; Ishikawa K; Miyazaki K; Yoshida K; Furuhashi M; Tamakoshi K
Int J Med Sci; 2012; 9(6):488-91. PubMed ID: 22927774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Costantine MM; Fox K; Byers BD; Mateus J; Ghulmiyyah LM; Blackwell S; Hankins GDV; Grobman WA; Saade G
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 114(5):1029-1033. PubMed ID: 20168103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in women with two prior cesarean deliveries.
Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Faucett AM; Grobman WA
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 125(4):948-952. PubMed ID: 25751218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mid-trimester cervical length and prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Chinese parturients: A retrospective study.
Liu G; Zhou C; Wang S; Zhang H
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Nov; 52(9):102647. PubMed ID: 37611746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does information available at delivery improve the accuracy of predicting vaginal birth after cesarean? Validation of the published models in an independent patient cohort.
Costantine MM; Fox KA; Pacheco LD; Mateus J; Hankins GD; Grobman WA; Saade GR
Am J Perinatol; 2011 Apr; 28(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 21225561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the close-to-delivery prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in a Middle Eastern cohort.
Abdel Aziz A; Abd Rabbo A; Sayed Ahmed WA; Khamees RE; Atwa KA
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jul; 134(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 27118509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does midtrimester cervical length aid in predicting vaginal birth after cesarean?
Miller ES; Sakowicz A; Donelan EA; Grobman WA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 212(6):791.e1-4. PubMed ID: 25726519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prediction model of vaginal birth after cesarean in the preterm period.
Mardy AH; Ananth CV; Grobman WA; Gyamfi-Bannerman C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):513.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27262971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of prediction model for successful vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery based on sonographic assessment of hysterotomy scar.
Baranov A; Salvesen KÅ; Vikhareva O
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 51(2):189-193. PubMed ID: 28233347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. External validation of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery calculator in Israeli cohort of parturients and construction of an improved model.
Haggiag N; Eitan S; Maor-Sagie E; Hallak M; Gabbay-Benziv R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Apr; 161(1):182-189. PubMed ID: 36066199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of successful trial of labor after cesarean - the benefit of prior vaginal delivery.
Ashwal E; Wertheimer A; Aviram A; Wiznitzer A; Yogev Y; Hiersch L
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(16):2665-70. PubMed ID: 26399162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are prediction models for vaginal birth after cesarean accurate?
Harris BS; Heine RP; Park J; Faurot KR; Hopkins MK; Rivara AJ; Kemeny HR; Grotegut CA; Jelovsek JE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 220(5):492.e1-492.e7. PubMed ID: 30716285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the predictive accuracy of the new vaginal birth after cesarean delivery calculator.
Adjei NN; McMillan C; Hosier H; Partridge C; Adeyemo OO; Illuzzi J
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jun; 5(6):100960. PubMed ID: 37028551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after caesarean.
Chaillet N; Bujold E; Dubé E; Grobman WA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Feb; 35(2):119-124. PubMed ID: 23470060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Bhide A; Caric V; Arulkumaran S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 26952353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. External validation of a prediction model on vaginal birth after caesarean in a The Netherlands: a prospective cohort study.
Vankan E; van Kuijk SMJ; Nijhuis JG; Aardenburg R; Delemarre FMC; Dirksen CD; van Dooren IM; Kuppens SMI; Kwee A; Langenveld J; Schoorel EN; Smits LJ; Hermens RP; Scheepers HC
J Perinat Med; 2021 Mar; 49(3):357-363. PubMed ID: 33155996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Southeast China: a retrospective cohort study.
Zhang HL; Zheng LH; Cheng LC; Liu ZD; Yu L; Han Q; Miao GY; Yan JY
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Sep; 20(1):538. PubMed ID: 32933509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting the chance of vaginal delivery after one cesarean section: validation and elaboration of a published prediction model.
Fagerberg MC; Maršál K; Källén K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():88-94. PubMed ID: 25801723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Number of prior vaginal deliveries and trial of labor after cesarean success.
Atia O; Rotem R; Reichman O; Jaffe A; Grisaru-Granovsky S; Sela HY; Rottenstreich M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Jan; 256():189-193. PubMed ID: 33246204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. French validation and adaptation of the Grobman nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Haumonte JB; Raylet M; Christophe M; Mauviel F; Bertrand A; Desbriere R; d'Ercole C
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 47(3):127-131. PubMed ID: 29229362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
