These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22928387)

  • 1. Evaluation of the roughness of composite resins submitted to different surface treatments.
    Gonçalves MA; Teixeira VC; Rodrigues SS; de Oliveira RS; Salvio LA
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2012; 25(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 22928387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing.
    Jung M; Eichelberger K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 17695607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing.
    Jung M; Sehr K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 17288328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finishing systems on the final surface roughness of composites.
    Koh R; Neiva G; Dennison J; Yaman P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 18264536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of linear polymerization shrinkage and microhardness between QTH-cured & LED-cured composites.
    Park SH; Kim SS; Cho YS; Lee SY; Noh BD
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 16130866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface roughness of one nanofill and one silorane composite after polishing.
    Buchgraber B; Kqiku L; Allmer N; Jakopic G; Städtler P
    Coll Antropol; 2011 Sep; 35(3):879-83. PubMed ID: 22053571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials.
    Uçtaşli MB; Arisu HD; Omürlü H; Eligüzeloğlu E; Ozcan S; Ergun G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17277831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface finish produced on three resin composites by new polishing systems.
    St-Georges AJ; Bolla M; Fortin D; Muller-Bolla M; Thompson JY; Stamatiades PJ
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):593-7. PubMed ID: 16268393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of polishing techniques on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins.
    Sarac D; Sarac YS; Kulunk S; Ural C; Kulunk T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jul; 96(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 16872928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites.
    Gönülol N; Yilmaz F
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40 Suppl 2():e64-70. PubMed ID: 22819955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of a glaze/composite sealant on the 3-D surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials.
    Perez Cdos R; Hirata RJ; da Silva AH; Sampaio EM; de Miranda MS
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(6):674-80. PubMed ID: 19953776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins.
    Barbosa SH; Zanata RL; Navarro MF; Nunes OB
    Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 16113932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing.
    Senawongse P; Pongprueksa P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. PubMed ID: 17877626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.
    Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conventional polishing techniques versus a nanofilled surface sealer: preliminary findings regarding surface roughness changes and analysis.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW
    J Clin Dent; 2010; 21(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20527508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional surface profile analysis of different types of flowable restorative resins following different finishing protocols.
    Yazici AR; Müftü A; Kugel G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jul; 8(5):9-17. PubMed ID: 17618325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surface roughness of flowable and packable composite resin materials after finishing with abrasive discs.
    Uçtaşli MB; Bala O; Güllü A
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Dec; 31(12):1197-202. PubMed ID: 15544656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of finishing/polishing systems on the surface roughness of novel posterior composites.
    Marghalani HY
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Apr; 22(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 20433565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.