These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Metapopulation models for extinction threshold in spatially correlated landscapes. Ovaskainen O; Sato K; Bascompte J; Hanski I J Theor Biol; 2002 Mar; 215(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 12051987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Local perturbations do not affect stability of laboratory fruitfly metapopulations. Dey S; Joshi A PLoS One; 2007 Feb; 2(2):e233. PubMed ID: 17311100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. How patch configuration affects the impact of disturbances on metapopulation persistence. Vuilleumier S; Wilcox C; Cairns BJ; Possingham HP Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Aug; 72(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 17275866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Metapopulation dynamics with quasi-local competition. Doebeli M; Killingback T Theor Popul Biol; 2003 Dec; 64(4):397-416. PubMed ID: 14630478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Which spatial heterogeneity framework? Consequences for conclusions about patchy population distributions. Talley TS Ecology; 2007 Jun; 88(6):1476-89. PubMed ID: 17601140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Consistent scaling of persistence time in metapopulations. Yaari G; Ben-Zion Y; Shnerb NM; Vasseur DA Ecology; 2012 May; 93(5):1214-27. PubMed ID: 22764507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. How individual links affect network stability in a large-scale, heterogeneous metacommunity. Brodie JF; Mohd-Azlan J; Schnell JK Ecology; 2016 Jul; 97(7):1658-1667. PubMed ID: 27859156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dispersal and metapopulation stability. Wang S; Haegeman B; Loreau M PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1295. PubMed ID: 26557427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Changing seascapes, stochastic connectivity, and marine metapopulation dynamics. Watson JR; Kendall BE; Siegel DA; Mitarai S Am Nat; 2012 Jul; 180(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 22673654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reactive persistence, spatial management, and conservation of metapopulations: An application to seagrass restoration. Aiken CM; Navarrete SA; Jackson EL Ecol Appl; 2023 Mar; 33(2):e2774. PubMed ID: 36315164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Unexpected coherence and conservation. Cazelles B; Bottani S; Stone L Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Dec; 268(1485):2595-602. PubMed ID: 11749716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Extinction dynamics and the regional persistence of a tree frog metapopulation. Carlson A; Edenhamn P Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Jul; 267(1450):1311-3. PubMed ID: 10972125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Metapopulation dynamics on the brink of extinction. Eriksson A; Elías-Wolff F; Mehlig B Theor Popul Biol; 2013 Feb; 83():101-22. PubMed ID: 23047064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A stochastic structured metapopulation model to assess recovery scenarios of patchily distributed endangered species: Case study for a Mojave Desert rodent. Castle ST; Foley P; Clifford DL; Foley J PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0237516. PubMed ID: 32790738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Metapopulation dynamics: Does it help to have more of the same? Hanski I Trends Ecol Evol; 1989 Apr; 4(4):113-4. PubMed ID: 21227332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Lemur species-specific metapopulation responses to habitat loss and fragmentation. Steffens TS; Lehman SM PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0195791. PubMed ID: 29742108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]