These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22928532)

  • 1. Sonographic assessment of post-cesarean section uterine scar in pregnant women.
    Markovitch O; Tepper R; Hershkovitz R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Jan; 26(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 22928532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sonographic imaging of cervical scars after Cesarean section.
    Zimmer EZ; Bardin R; Tamir A; Bronshtein M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 23(6):594-8. PubMed ID: 15170802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Easy sonographic differential diagnosis between intrauterine pregnancy and cesarean delivery scar pregnancy in the early first trimester.
    Timor-Tritsch IE; Monteagudo A; Cali G; El Refaey H; Kaelin Agten A; Arslan AA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):225.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26899908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of risk factors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():141-5. PubMed ID: 27591715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Position and integrity of uterine scar are determined by degree of cervical dilatation at time of Cesarean section.
    Kamel R; Eissa T; Sharaf M; Negm S; Thilaganathan B
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):466-470. PubMed ID: 32330331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transvaginal Sonographic Evaluation of Cesarean Section Scar Niche in Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
    Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Paskauskas S; Ramoniene G; Nadisauskiene RJ
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Oct; 57(10):. PubMed ID: 34684128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pilot study of MRI/ultrasound fusion imaging in postpartum assessment of Cesarean section scar.
    Bolten K; Fischer T; Bender YY; Diederichs G; Thomas A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 50(4):520-526. PubMed ID: 27804175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hysterotomy level at Cesarean section and occurrence of large scar defects: a randomized single-blind trial.
    Vikhareva O; Rickle GS; Lavesson T; Nedopekina E; Brandell K; Salvesen KÅ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):438-442. PubMed ID: 30484920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy closure: a prospective cross-sectional study.
    Tekiner NB; Çetin BA; Türkgeldi LS; Yılmaz G; Polat İ; Gedikbaşı A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 29397441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cesarean Scar Thickness Decreases during Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
    Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Kliucinskas M; Paskauskas S
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Mar; 58(3):. PubMed ID: 35334583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with a single previous Cesarean section.
    Sanlorenzo O; Farina A; Pula G; Zanello M; Pedrazzi A; Martina T; Gabrielli S; Simonazzi G; Rizzo N
    Minerva Ginecol; 2013 Oct; 65(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 24096291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors.
    Ofili-Yebovi D; Ben-Nagi J; Sawyer E; Yazbek J; Lee C; Gonzalez J; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 31(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 18061960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in uterine flexion caused by cesarean section: correlation between post-flexion and deficient cesarean section scars.
    Ryo E; Sakurai R; Kamata H; Seto M; Morita M; Ayabe T
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2016 Apr; 43(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 27033868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment at term in women with previous cesarean delivery.
    Kushtagi P; Garepalli S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Mar; 283(3):455-9. PubMed ID: 20145938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can the final sonographic assessment of the cesarean section scar be predicted 6 weeks after the operation?
    Dosedla E; Calda P
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 55(5):718-720. PubMed ID: 27751422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Ultrasonographic analysis of cesarean scars features in nonpregnant uterus].
    Zimmer M; Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Tomiałowicz M; Michniewicz J; Wiatrowski A; Mikołajczyk K
    Ginekol Pol; 2007 Nov; 78(11):842-6. PubMed ID: 18306913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The association of endometrial closure during cesarean section to the risk of developing uterine scar defect: a randomized control trial.
    Mohr-Sasson A; Castel E; Dadon T; Brandt A; Etinger R; Cohen A; Zajicek M; Haas J; Mashiach R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 May; 309(5):2063-2070. PubMed ID: 38498161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproducibility of assessment of full-dilatation Cesarean section scar in women undergoing second-trimester screening for preterm birth.
    Banerjee A; Al-Dabbach Z; Bredaki FE; Casagrandi D; Tetteh A; Greenwold N; Ivan M; Jurkovic D; David AL; Napolitano R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Sep; 60(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 35809243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic and vaginal repair of uterine scar dehiscence following cesarean section as detected by ultrasound.
    Klemm P; Koehler C; Mangler M; Schneider U; Schneider A
    J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 16207118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.