These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22928650)
1. A meta-analysis of the accuracy and precision of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM). Chong SW; Peyton PJ Anaesthesia; 2012 Nov; 67(11):1266-71. PubMed ID: 22928650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study. Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the clinical utility of an ultrasonic monitor of cardiac output (the USCOM) and agreement with thermodilution measurement. Boyle M; Steel L; Flynn GM; Murgo M; Nicholson L; O'Brien M; Bihari D Crit Care Resusc; 2009 Sep; 11(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 19737122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients. van Lelyveld-Haas LE; van Zanten AR; Borm GF; Tjan DH Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Nov; 25(11):917-24. PubMed ID: 18652712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of cardiac output measurements with pulse contour analysis (PulseCO) and Doppler echocardiography during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Missant C; Rex S; Wouters PF Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 17996125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multicenter study verifying a method of noninvasive continuous cardiac output measurement using pulse wave transit time: a comparison with intermittent bolus thermodilution cardiac output. Yamada T; Tsutsui M; Sugo Y; Sato T; Akazawa T; Sato N; Yamashita K; Ishihara H; Takeda J Anesth Analg; 2012 Jul; 115(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 22467885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. USCOM (Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitors) lacks agreement with thermodilution cardiac output and transoesophageal echocardiography valve measurements. Van den Oever HL; Murphy EJ; Christie-Taylor GA Anaesth Intensive Care; 2007 Dec; 35(6):903-10. PubMed ID: 18084981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transoesophageal echocardiography accurately detects cardiac output variation: a prospective comparison with thermodilution in cardiac surgery. Parra V; Fita G; Rovira I; Matute P; Gomar C; Paré C Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Feb; 25(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 17672920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical study of neonatal cardiac output measurement methods]. Zheng ML; Sun X; Zhong J; He SR; Pan W; Pang CC; Sun YX; Liu YM Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 51(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 23527933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Peyton PJ; Chong SW Anesthesiology; 2010 Nov; 113(5):1220-35. PubMed ID: 20881596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison between continuous and intermittent thermodilution measurement of cardiac output during coronary artery bypass operation]. Schulz K; Abel HH; Werning P Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1997 Apr; 32(4):226-33. PubMed ID: 9289022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Precision of bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation. Ostergaard M; Nilsson LB; Nilsson JC; Rasmussen JP; Berthelsen PG Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Mar; 49(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 15752403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of continuous with intermittent bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements. Ditmyer CE; Shively M; Burns DB; Reichman RT Am J Crit Care; 1995 Nov; 4(6):460-5. PubMed ID: 8556087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Continuous versus bolus cardiac output monitoring during orthotopic liver transplantation. Bao FP; Wu J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2008 Apr; 7(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 18397847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of cardiac output measurement using the CardioQP oesophageal Doppler with cardiac output measurement using thermodilution technique in children during heart catheterisation. ; Knirsch W; Kretschmar O; Tomaske M; Stutz K; Nagdyman N; Balmer C; Schmitz A; Berger F; Bauersfeld U; Weiss M Anaesthesia; 2008 Aug; 63(8):851-5. PubMed ID: 18557743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit. Tan HL; Pinder M; Parsons R; Roberts B; van Heerden PV Br J Anaesth; 2005 Mar; 94(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 15653709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cardiac output estimation with a new Doppler device after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Chand R; Mehta Y; Trehan N J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2006 Jun; 20(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 16750729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intra-operative evaluation of a continuous versus intermittent bolus thermodilution technique of cardiac output measurement in cardiac surgical patients. Rödig G; Keyl C; Liebold A; Hobbhahn J Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1998 Mar; 15(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 9587726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement of cardiac output after cardiac surgery by a new transesophageal Doppler device. Jaeggi P; Hofer CK; Klaghofer R; Fodor P; Genoni M; Zollinger A J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2003 Apr; 17(2):217-20. PubMed ID: 12698405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]