BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22929166)

  • 1. MLEP: an R package for exploring the maximum likelihood estimates of penetrance parameters.
    Sugaya Y
    BMC Res Notes; 2012 Aug; 5():465. PubMed ID: 22929166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic Analysis Workshop II: results of incorporating a linkage disequilibrium parameter.
    Goldgar DE; Fain PR
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 14971367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maximum likelihood estimation of quantitative trait loci parameters with the aid of genetic markers using a standard statistical package.
    Elkind Y; Nir B; Weller JI
    Comput Appl Biosci; 1994 Sep; 10(5):513-7. PubMed ID: 7828067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A study comparing precision of the maximum multipoint heterogeneity LOD statistic to three model-free multipoint linkage methods.
    Finch SJ; Chen CH; Gordon D; Mendell NR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):315-25. PubMed ID: 11754467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci in the presence of heterogeneity.
    Ekstrøm CT; Dalgaard P
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 12890922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors III: marker loci and their map as nuisance parameters.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1298-309. PubMed ID: 10731467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic Analysis Workshop II: study of Problem 2 linkage relationships by different methods.
    Demenais F; Darlu P
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(2):171-4. PubMed ID: 14964299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maximum likelihood estimates of allele frequencies and error rates from samples of related individuals by gene counting.
    Thomas A; Camp NJ
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(6):771-2. PubMed ID: 16410318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pedigree analysis package vs. MIXD: fitting the mixed model on a large pedigree.
    Olshen AB; Wijsman EM
    Genet Epidemiol; 1996; 13(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 8647381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exact multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in pedigrees by variance components.
    Pratt SC; Daly MJ; Kruglyak L
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Mar; 66(3):1153-7. PubMed ID: 10712227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating penetrance from family data using a retrospective likelihood when ascertainment depends on genotype and age of onset.
    Carayol J; Bonaïti-Pellié C
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 27(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 15305327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Replication of linkage studies of complex traits: an examination of variation in location estimates.
    Roberts SB; MacLean CJ; Neale MC; Eaves LJ; Kendler KS
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Sep; 65(3):876-84. PubMed ID: 10441592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. HapSim: a simulation tool for generating haplotype data with pre-specified allele frequencies and LD coefficients.
    Montana G
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4309-11. PubMed ID: 16188927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Allele frequency misspecification: effect on power and Type I error of model-dependent linkage analysis of quantitative traits under random ascertainment.
    Mandal DM; Sorant AJ; Atwood LD; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE
    BMC Genet; 2006 Apr; 7():21. PubMed ID: 16618369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-locus models of disease: comparison of likelihood and nonparametric linkage methods.
    Goldin LR; Weeks DE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1993 Oct; 53(4):908-15. PubMed ID: 8213819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. mixIndependR: a R package for statistical independence testing of loci in database of multi-locus genotypes.
    Song B; Woerner AE; Planz J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Jan; 22(1):12. PubMed ID: 33407074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct power comparisons between simple LOD scores and NPL scores for linkage analysis in complex diseases.
    Abreu PC; Greenberg DA; Hodge SE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Sep; 65(3):847-57. PubMed ID: 10441591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Joint modeling of linkage and association: identifying SNPs responsible for a linkage signal.
    Li M; Boehnke M; Abecasis GR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2005 Jun; 76(6):934-49. PubMed ID: 15877278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic Analysis Workshop II: segregation and linkage analysis.
    Namboodiri KK; Kaplan EB
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 14971376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detecting Pedigree Relationship Errors.
    Sun L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():25-44. PubMed ID: 28980240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.