These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22929263)
1. A microneurovascular TRAM flap does not compromise abdominal sensibility more than a conventional one. Puonti HK; Jääskeläinen SK; Hallikainen HK; Partanen TA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Sep; 130(3):392e-397e. PubMed ID: 22929263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensibility following innervated free TRAM flap for breast reconstruction: Part II. Innervation improves patient-rated quality of life. Temple CLF; Ross DC; Kim S; Tse R; Bettger-Hahn M; Gan BS; MacDermid J Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Nov; 124(5):1419-1425. PubMed ID: 20009826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new approach to microneurovascular TRAM-flap breast reconstruction--a pilot study. Puonti HK; Jääskeläinen SK; Hallikainen HK; Partanen TA J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 Mar; 64(3):346-52. PubMed ID: 20542483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of abdominal sensibility after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Spear SL; Hess CL; Elmaraghy MW Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Nov; 106(6):1300-4. PubMed ID: 11083559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of smoking on complications in patients undergoing free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Chang DW; Reece GP; Wang B; Robb GL; Miller MJ; Evans GR; Langstein HN; Kroll SS Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Jun; 105(7):2374-80. PubMed ID: 10845289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensibility following innervated free TRAM flap for breast reconstruction. Temple CL; Tse R; Bettger-Hahn M; MacDermid J; Gan BS; Ross DC Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Jun; 117(7):2119-27; discussion 2128-30. PubMed ID: 16772904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Chun YS; Sinha I; Turko A; Yueh JH; Lipsitz S; Pribaz JJ; Lee BT Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 20555301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Somatosensory status after pedicled or free TRAM flap surgery: a retrospective study. Edsander-Nord A; Wickman M; Hansson P Plast Reconstr Surg; 1999 Nov; 104(6):1642-8. PubMed ID: 10541163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference? Nahabedian MY; Tsangaris T; Momen B Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Feb; 115(2):436-44; discussion 445-6. PubMed ID: 15692347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The midabdominal TRAM flap for breast reconstruction in morbidly obese patients. Gabbay JS; Eby JB; Kulber DA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Mar; 115(3):764-70. PubMed ID: 15731676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) catheters inserted under direct vision in the donor site following free DIEP and MS-TRAM breast reconstruction: a prospective cohort study of 45 patients. Zhong T; Wong KW; Cheng H; Ojha M; Srinivas C; McCluskey SA; Clarke H; Jacks L; Hofer SO J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Mar; 66(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 23142025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The sensational transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap: return of sensibility after TRAM breast reconstruction. Slezak S; McGibbon B; Dellon AL Ann Plast Surg; 1992 Mar; 28(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 1575422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes and patient satisfaction following breast reconstruction with bilateral pedicled TRAM flaps in 105 consecutive patients. Chun YS; Sinha I; Turko A; Lipsitz S; Pribaz JJ Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Jan; 125(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19910856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical and ultrasound evaluation of donor site morbidity after tram-flap for breast reconstruction. Benditte-Klepetko H; Sommer O; Steinbach R; Czembirek H; Deutinger M Microsurgery; 2004; 24(3):174-81. PubMed ID: 15160374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps. Chevray PM Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Importance of right subcostal incisions in patients undergoing TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Losken A; Carlson GW; Jones GE; Culbertson JH; Schoemann M; Bostwick J Ann Plast Surg; 2002 Aug; 49(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 12187336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Strategies and options for free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in patients with midline abdominal scars. Heller L; Feledy JA; Chang DW Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Sep; 116(3):753-9; discussion 760-1. PubMed ID: 16141811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immediate, bilateral transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstruction after mastectomy. Wilkins EG; August DA; Chang AD; Smith DJ Am Surg; 1993 Aug; 59(8):519-22; discussion 522-4. PubMed ID: 8338283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term evaluation of postmastectomy breast reconstruction with the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. Christensen BO; Overgaard J; Kettner LO; Damsgaard TE J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2013 Oct; 47(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 23710788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]