These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22929390)

  • 21. Neural correlates of the rejection of unfair offers in the impunity game.
    Takagishi H; Takahashi T; Toyomura A; Takashino N; Koizumi M; Yamagishi T
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2009; 30(4):496-500. PubMed ID: 20010492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Distinct neural activation patterns underlie economic decisions in high and low psychopathy scorers.
    Vieira JB; Almeida PR; Ferreira-Santos F; Barbosa F; Marques-Teixeira J; Marsh AA
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Aug; 9(8):1099-107. PubMed ID: 23748499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Affective state and decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.
    van 't Wout M; Kahn RS; Sanfey AG; Aleman A
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 169(4):564-8. PubMed ID: 16489438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The private rejection of unfair offers and emotional commitment.
    Yamagishi T; Horita Y; Takagishi H; Shinada M; Tanida S; Cook KS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Jul; 106(28):11520-3. PubMed ID: 19564602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
    Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Unfairness sensitivity and social decision-making in individuals with alcohol dependence: a preliminary study.
    Brevers D; Noël X; Ermer E; Dabiri D; Verbanck P; Kornreich C
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2013 Dec; 133(2):772-5. PubMed ID: 24021763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preference and strategy in proposer's prosocial giving in the ultimatum game.
    Inaba M; Inoue Y; Akutsu S; Takahashi N; Yamagishi T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193877. PubMed ID: 29505587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Examination of social decision making in patients with schizophrenia using ultimatum game.
    Patil VA; Jacob AA; Chacko DM; Chakrabarti D; Devi P; Thonse U; Kumar V; Varambally S; Venkatasubramanian G; Rao NP
    Asian J Psychiatr; 2020 Apr; 50():101937. PubMed ID: 32109802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Being the chosen one: social inclusion modulates decisions in the ultimatum game. An ERP study.
    Falco A; Albinet C; Rattat AC; Paul I; Fabre E
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 14(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30608613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Older adults consider others' intentions less but allocentric outcomes more than young adults during an ultimatum game.
    Cho I; Song HJ; Kim H; Sul S
    Psychol Aging; 2020 Nov; 35(7):974-980. PubMed ID: 32915006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On the generality of age differences in social and nonsocial decision making.
    Rieger M; Mata R
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2015 Mar; 70(2):202-14. PubMed ID: 24056582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of emotion regulation and choice repetition bias in the ultimatum game.
    Chung JCY; Bhatoa RS; Kirkpatrick R; Woodcock KA
    Emotion; 2023 Jun; 23(4):925-936. PubMed ID: 36048029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Saliency modulates affective evaluations but not behavioral responses in the ultimatum game.
    Liu C; Chai J; Yu R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():99-107. PubMed ID: 29331200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sex and the money--How gender stereotypes modulate economic decision-making: An ERP study.
    Fabre EF; Causse M; Pesciarelli F; Cacciari C
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():221-32. PubMed ID: 26102185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does interoceptive awareness affect the ability to regulate unfair treatment by others?
    van 't Wout M; Faught S; Menino D
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():880. PubMed ID: 24348438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Anterior insula signals inequalities in a modified Ultimatum Game.
    Cheng X; Zheng L; Li L; Zheng Y; Guo X; Yang G
    Neuroscience; 2017 Apr; 348():126-134. PubMed ID: 28223239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Proportion offered in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games decreases with amount and social distance.
    Bechler C; Green L; Myerson J
    Behav Processes; 2015 Jun; 115():149-55. PubMed ID: 25862989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The price of racial bias: intergroup negotiations in the ultimatum game.
    Kubota JT; Li J; Bar-David E; Banaji MR; Phelps EA
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2498-504. PubMed ID: 24121413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influences of State and Trait Affect on Behavior, Feedback-Related Negativity, and P3b in the Ultimatum Game.
    Riepl K; Mussel P; Osinsky R; Hewig J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146358. PubMed ID: 26742103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Are irrational reactions to unfairness truly emotionally-driven? Dissociated behavioural and emotional responses in the Ultimatum Game task.
    Civai C; Corradi-Dell'Acqua C; Gamer M; Rumiati RI
    Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 19786275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.