These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22929629)

  • 1. Comparison of Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for pre-induction cervical ripening at-term.
    Chitrakar NS
    J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2012 Jan; 10(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 22929629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R; Greaves PC
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized comparison of one single dose of vaginal 50 microg misoprostol with 3 mg dinoprostone in pre-induction cervical ripening.
    Charoenkul S; Sripramote M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Sep; 83(9):1026-34. PubMed ID: 11075969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
    Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Saxena P; Puri M; Bajaj M; Mishra A; Trivedi SS
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):759-63. PubMed ID: 21780543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Cervical ripening at term. A randomized and prospective study: Misoprotol versus dinoprostone].
    Trabelsi H; Mathlouthi N; Zayen S; Dhouib M; Chaabene K; Trabelsi K; Amouri H; Ben Ayed B; Guermazi M
    Tunis Med; 2012 May; 90(5):362-9. PubMed ID: 22585642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH; Chang FM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of misoprostol, controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert and oxytocin for cervical ripening.
    Silfeler DB; Tandogan B; Ayvaci H; Silfeler I; Yenidede I; Dayicioglu V
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Dec; 284(6):1331-7. PubMed ID: 21290140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomised controlled trial of low-dose misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal pessaries for cervical priming.
    Tan TC; Yan SY; Chua TM; Biswas A; Chong YS
    BJOG; 2010 Sep; 117(10):1270-7. PubMed ID: 20722643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of efficacy and safety of sublingual misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening in prelabour rupture of membranes after 34 weeks of gestation.
    Jha N; Sagili H; Jayalakshmi D; Lakshminarayanan S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jan; 291(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 25055933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective randomised controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal Misoprostol with intracervical Cerviprime for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix.
    Krithika KS; Aggarwal N; Suri V
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 18569471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.
    Ayad IA
    East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
    Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.
    Fonseca L; Wood HC; Lucas MJ; Ramin SM; Phatak D; Gilstrap LC; Yeomans ER
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):305.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18771993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomised double-blind study of vaginal misoprostol vs dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labour induction in prolonged pregnancy.
    Lee HY
    Singapore Med J; 1997 Jul; 38(7):292-4. PubMed ID: 9339095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of misoprostol for cervical ripening.
    Katz VL; Farmer RM; Dean CA; Carpenter ME
    South Med J; 2000 Sep; 93(9):881-4. PubMed ID: 11005347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.