These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22930369)

  • 1. Do you want to convince me or to be understood?: preference-consistent information sharing and its motivational determinants.
    Faulmüller N; Mojzisch A; Kerschreiter R; Schulz-Hardt S
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Dec; 38(12):1684-96. PubMed ID: 22930369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving comprehension of informed consent.
    Kusec S; Oresković S; Skegro M; Korolija D; Busić Z; Horzić M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Mar; 60(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 16427762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selective exposure and information quantity: how different information quantities moderate decision makers' preference for consistent and inconsistent information.
    Fischer P; Schulz-Hardt S; Frey D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Feb; 94(2):231-44. PubMed ID: 18211174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrepancy between participants' understanding and desire to know in informed consent: are they informed about what they really want to know?
    Koh J; Goh E; Yu KS; Cho B; Yang JH
    J Med Ethics; 2012 Feb; 38(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 21708828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The myth of informed consent in rectal cancer surgery: what do patients retain?
    Scheer AS; O'Connor AM; Chan BP; Moloo H; Poulin EC; Mamazza J; Auer RC; Boushey RP
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Sep; 55(9):970-5. PubMed ID: 22874604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Participants' recall and understanding of genomic research and large-scale data sharing.
    Robinson JO; Slashinski MJ; Wang T; Hilsenbeck SG; McGuire AL
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2013 Oct; 8(4):42-52. PubMed ID: 24169421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed consent in trauma: does written information improve patient recall of risks? A prospective randomised study.
    Smith HK; Manjaly JG; Yousri T; Upadhyay N; Taylor H; Nicol SG; Livingstone JA
    Injury; 2012 Sep; 43(9):1534-8. PubMed ID: 21782171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Communicating stereotype-relevant information: is factual information subject to the same communication biases as fictional information?
    Goodman RL; Webb TL; Stewart AJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jul; 35(7):836-52. PubMed ID: 19407003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motivated to retrieve: how often are you willing to go back to the well when the well is dry?
    Dougherty MR; Harbison JI
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1108-17. PubMed ID: 17983316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of format modifications and reading comprehension on recall of informed consent information by low-income parents: a comparison of print, video, and computer-based presentations.
    Campbell FA; Goldman BD; Boccia ML; Skinner M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2004 May; 53(2):205-16. PubMed ID: 15140461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions.
    Greitemeyer T; Schulz-Hardt S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Feb; 84(2):322-39. PubMed ID: 12585807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How informed is online informed consent?
    Varnhagen CK; Gushta M; Daniels J; Peters TC; Parmar N; Law D; Hirsch R; Takach BS; Johnson T
    Ethics Behav; 2005; 15(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 16127857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hidden profiles and concealed information: strategic information sharing and use in group decision making.
    Toma C; Butera F
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jun; 35(6):793-806. PubMed ID: 19332434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of verbal explanation and modified consent materials on orthodontic informed consent.
    Carr KM; Fields HW; Beck FM; Kang EY; Kiyak HA; Pawlak CE; Firestone AR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):174-86. PubMed ID: 22284285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Informed consent or choice? An ethical dilemma in oncology practice].
    Vennin P
    Bull Cancer; 2007 May; 94(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 17535783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patients' preferences for therapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: development, testing, and application of a bedside decision instrument.
    Elit LM; Levine MN; Gafni A; Whelan TJ; Doig G; Streiner DL; Rosen B
    Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Sep; 62(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 8812525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stereotypes help people connect with others in the community: a situated functional analysis of the stereotype consistency bias in communication.
    Clark AE; Kashima Y
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Dec; 93(6):1028-39. PubMed ID: 18072852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of informed consent in risks recall in otorhinolaryngology surgeries: verbal (nonintervention) vs written (intervention) summaries of risks.
    Aremu SK; Alabi BS; Segun-Busari S
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2011; 32(6):485-9. PubMed ID: 21093107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preference reversals are diminished when gambles are presented as relative frequencies.
    Tunney RJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1516-23. PubMed ID: 16873105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Views of US researchers about informed consent in international collaborative research.
    Dawson L; Kass NE
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Sep; 61(6):1211-22. PubMed ID: 15970232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.