These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22930945)

  • 1. InLab and Cerec Connect: virtual contacts in maximum intercuspation compared with original contacts--an in vitro study.
    Nemli SK; Wolfart S; Reich S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2012; 15(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 22930945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Maximum Intercuspal Contacts of Articulated Casts and Virtual Casts Requiring Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures.
    Arslan Y; Bankoğlu Güngör M; Karakoca Nemli S; Kökdoğan Boyacı B; Aydın C
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):594-598. PubMed ID: 26848940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of a conventional and virtual occlusal record.
    Solaberrieta E; Otegi JR; Goicoechea N; Brizuela A; Pradies G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 25858220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of biogeneric design techniques with CEREC CAD/CAM system.
    Arslan Y; Karakoca Nemli S; Bankoğlu Güngör M; Tamam E; Yılmaz H
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2015 Dec; 7(6):431-6. PubMed ID: 26816572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of contacts calculated from 3D images of occlusal surfaces.
    DeLong R; Knorr S; Anderson GC; Hodges J; Pintado MR
    J Dent; 2007 Jun; 35(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 17418474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dimensional and occlusal accuracy of a novel three-dimensional digital model of articulated dental arches.
    Tanaka Y; Hattori Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 23626985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of Buccal Scan Procedures for the Registration of Habitual Intercuspation.
    Zimmermann M; Ender A; Attin T; Mehl A
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(6):573-580. PubMed ID: 29630481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Accuracy of Transferring Casts in Maximal Intercuspal Position to a Virtual Articulator.
    He M; Ding Q; Li L; Yang G; Zhao Y; Sun Y; Zhang L
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):326-332. PubMed ID: 34196456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and precision of occlusal contacts of stereolithographic casts mounted by digital interocclusal registrations.
    Krahenbuhl JT; Cho SH; Irelan J; Bansal NK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 27068319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of transferring analog dental casts to a virtual articulator.
    Úry E; Fornai C; Weber GW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):305-313. PubMed ID: 31227241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cerec omnicam and the virtual articulator--a case report.
    Fritzsche G
    Int J Comput Dent; 2013; 16(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 23641664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determining the requirements, section quantity, and dimension of the virtual occlusal record.
    Solaberrieta E; Arias A; Brizuela A; Garikano X; Pradies G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jan; 115(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 26386482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Accuracy of intercuspal occlusion in 3D reconstruction with the dental articulator position method].
    Li LL; Zhao YJ; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun YC
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):138-143. PubMed ID: 32071477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional quantification of color-marked occlusal paths on anatomically oriented casts.
    Dirksen D; Runte C; Böröcz Z; Thomas C; von Bally G; Bollmann F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 11208205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The accuracy of virtual interocclusal registration during intraoral scanning.
    Edher F; Hannam AG; Tobias DL; Wyatt CCL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):904-912. PubMed ID: 29961618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
    Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of two CEREC software systems in evaluating manufacturing time and accuracy of restorations.
    Reich SM; Peltz ID; Wichmann M; Estafan DJ
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 15960477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoral Digital Impressions for Virtual Occlusal Records: Section Quantity and Dimensions.
    Solaberrieta E; Garmendia A; Brizuela A; Otegi JR; Pradies G; Szentpétery A
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():7173824. PubMed ID: 26881226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the accuracy of a 3-dimensional virtual method and the conventional method for transferring the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E; Mínguez R; Barrenetxea L; Otegi JR; Szentpétery A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 25557006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.