These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22932144)

  • 21. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The MuSIC perception test: a novel battery for testing music perception of cochlear implant users.
    Brockmeier SJ; Fitzgerald D; Searle O; Fitzgerald H; Grasmeder M; Hilbig S; Vermiere K; Peterreins M; Heydner S; Arnold W
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Feb; 12(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21756454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Recognition of "real-world" musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.
    Gfeller K; Olszewski C; Rychener M; Sena K; Knutson JF; Witt S; Macpherson B
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):237-50. PubMed ID: 15937406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Free field frequency discrimination abilities of cochlear implant users.
    Pretorius LL; Hanekom JJ
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):77-84. PubMed ID: 18692556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
    Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. From fragments to the whole: a comparison between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners in music perception and enjoyment.
    Alexander AJ; Bartel L; Friesen L; Shipp D; Chen J
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 21303594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adult Cochlear Implant Users Are Able to Discriminate Basic Tonal Features in Musical Patterns: Evidence From Event-related Potentials.
    Hahne A; Mainka A; Leuner A; Mürbe D
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):e360-8. PubMed ID: 27631660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of music perception in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users and normal-hearing subjects.
    Veekmans K; Ressel L; Mueller J; Vischer M; Brockmeier SJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(5):315-26. PubMed ID: 19372650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Emotional and analytic music perception in cochlear implant users after optimizing the speech processor.
    Rosslau K; Spreckelmeyer KN; Saalfeld H; Westhofen M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Jan; 132(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 22026456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of gender on the hearing performance of adult cochlear implant patients.
    Lenarz M; Sönmez H; Joseph G; Büchner A; Lenarz T
    Laryngoscope; 2012 May; 122(5):1126-9. PubMed ID: 22374914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.
    Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Nogaki G
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):302-19. PubMed ID: 17485980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Long-term performance of cochlear implants in postlingually deafened adults.
    Lenarz M; Sönmez H; Joseph G; Büchner A; Lenarz T
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Jul; 147(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 22344289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Music therapy as specific and complementary training for adults after cochlear implantation: A pilot study.
    Hutter E; Argstatter H; Grapp M; Plinkert PK
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S13-21. PubMed ID: 26047068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mandarin lexical tone recognition in sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Wang S; Liu B; Zhang H; Dong R; Mannell R; Newall P; Chen X; Qi B; Zhang L; Han D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Jan; 133(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 23240663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Speech and pitch perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy].
    Gu P; Xi X; Han D; Hong M; Wang Q; Yang S; Dai P
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 May; 27(10):481-4. PubMed ID: 23937013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Contribution of hearing aids to music perception by cochlear implant users.
    Peterson N; Bergeson TR
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S71-8. PubMed ID: 26561890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
    Arnoldner C; Riss D; Kaider A; Mair A; Wagenblast J; Baumgartner WD; Gstöttner W; Hamzavi JS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Cochlear implant for non-deaf patients?].
    Müller-Deile J; Rudert H; Brademann G; Frese K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Mar; 77(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 9577819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.