BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22933339)

  • 21. A simple test for independent censoring under the proportional hazards model.
    Lee SY; Wolfe RA
    Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):1176-82. PubMed ID: 9840972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Power comparisons for group sequential tests with nonparametric statistics in case of nonproportional hazards.
    Demirhan H; Demirhan YP; Bacanli S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013 Mar; 23(2):447-60. PubMed ID: 23437950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bootstrap test for proportional hazard assumption on time-independent systematic effects of longevity data.
    Casellas J
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Apr; 128(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 21385224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The type I error and power of non-parametric logrank and Wilcoxon tests with adjustment for covariates--a simulation study.
    Jiang H; Symanowski J; Paul S; Qu Y; Zagar A; Hong S
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(28):5850-60. PubMed ID: 18759373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Investigating trial and treatment heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta-analysis of survival data by means of the penalized maximum likelihood approach.
    Rondeau V; Michiels S; Liquet B; Pignon JP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1894-910. PubMed ID: 18069745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Modeling dropout from adverse event data: impact of dosing regimens across pregabalin trials in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder.
    Lalovic B; Hutmacher M; Frame B; Miller R
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2011 May; 51(5):706-18. PubMed ID: 20663989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detection of multiple change points in a Weibull accelerated failure time model using sequential testing.
    Gierz K; Park K
    Biom J; 2022 Mar; 64(3):617-634. PubMed ID: 34873728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of time to event outcomes in randomized controlled trials by generalized additive models.
    Argyropoulos C; Unruh ML
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0123784. PubMed ID: 25906075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interim analysis on survival data: its potential bias and how to repair it.
    van Houwelingen HC; van de Velde CJ; Stijnen T
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2823-35. PubMed ID: 16025546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reformulating the hazard ratio to enhance communication with clinical investigators.
    Moser BK; McCann MH
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 18559414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Weighted win loss approach for analyzing prioritized outcomes.
    Luo X; Qiu J; Bai S; Tian H
    Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(15):2452-2465. PubMed ID: 28343373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bayesian analysis for monotone hazard ratio.
    Kim Y; Park JK; Kim G
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2011 Apr; 17(2):302-20. PubMed ID: 20635203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prediction of cumulative incidence function under the proportional hazards model.
    Cheng SC; Fine JP; Wei LJ
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):219-28. PubMed ID: 9544517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Are non-constant rates and non-proportional treatment effects accounted for in the design and analysis of randomised controlled trials? A review of current practice.
    Jachno K; Heritier S; Wolfe R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 May; 19(1):103. PubMed ID: 31096924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sensitivity of the hazard ratio to nonignorable treatment assignment in an observational study.
    Mitra N; Heitjan DF
    Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(6):1398-414. PubMed ID: 16779876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A single-index threshold Cox proportional hazard model for identifying a treatment-sensitive subset based on multiple biomarkers.
    He Y; Lin H; Tu D
    Stat Med; 2018 Oct; 37(23):3267-3279. PubMed ID: 29869381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of time-to-event data using a flexible mixture model under a constraint of proportional hazards.
    Liu GF; Liao JJZ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Sep; 30(5):783-796. PubMed ID: 32589509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A likelihood and resampling based approach to dichotomizing a continuous biomarker in medical research.
    Su M; Fang L; Su Z
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013 May; 23(3):637-47. PubMed ID: 23611200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Statistical inference for cancer trials with treatment switching.
    Shao J; Chang M; Chow SC
    Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(12):1783-90. PubMed ID: 15900586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimating and testing for center effects in competing risks.
    Katsahian S; Boudreau C
    Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1608-17. PubMed ID: 21341296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.