These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22933455)

  • 1. Stepping out of the caveman's shadow: nations' gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences.
    Zentner M; Mitura K
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1176-85. PubMed ID: 22933455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When the difference is in the details: a critique of Zentner and Mitura (2012) "Stepping out of the caveman's shadow: Nations' gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences".
    Schmitt DP
    Evol Psychol; 2012 Oct; 10(4):720-6. PubMed ID: 23107773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How Sexually Dimorphic Are Human Mate Preferences?
    Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM; Pham MN; Shackelford TK
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1082-93. PubMed ID: 26068718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evolution of human mate choice.
    Geary DC; Vigil J; Byrd-Craven J
    J Sex Res; 2004 Feb; 41(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 15216422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of ego-identity status in mating preferences.
    Dunkel CS; Papini DR
    Adolescence; 2005; 40(159):489-501. PubMed ID: 16268128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patterns and universals of mate poaching across 53 nations: the effects of sex, culture, and personality on romantically attracting another person's partner.
    Schmitt DP; Alcalay L; Allik J; Angleitner A; Ault L; Austers I; Bennett KL; Bianchi G; Boholst F; Borg Cunen MA; Braeckman J; Brainerd EG; Caral LG; Caron G; Casullo MM; Cunningham M; Daibo I; De Backer C; De Souza E; Diaz-Loving R; Diniz G; Durkin K; Echegaray M; Eremsoy E; Euler HA; Falzon R; Fisher ML; Foley D; Fry DP; Fry S; Ghayur MA; Golden DL; Grammer K; Grimaldi L; Halberstadt J; Haque S; Herrera D; Hertel J; Hoffmann H; Hooper D; Hradilekova Z; Hudek-Kene-evi J; Jaafar J; Jankauskaite M; Kabangu-Stahel H; Kardum I; Khoury B; Kwon H; Laidra K; Laireiter AR; Lakerveld D; Lampert A; Lauri M; Lavallée M; Lee SJ; Leung LC; Locke KD; Locke V; Luksik I; Magaisa I; Marcinkeviciene D; Mata A; Mata R; McCarthy B; Mills ME; Mkhize NJ; Moreira J; Moreira S; Moya M; Munyae M; Noller P; Opre A; Panayiotou A; Petrovic N; Poels K; Popper M; Poulimenou M; P'yatokha V; Raymond M; Reips UD; Reneau SE; Rivera-Aragon S; Rowatt WC; Ruch W; Rus VS; Safir MP; Salas S; Sambataro F; Sandnabba KN; Schulmeyer MK; Schütz A; Scrimali T; Shackelford TK; Shaver PR; Sichona F; Simonetti F; Sineshaw T; Sookdew R; Speelman T; Spyrou S; Sümer HC; Sümer N; Supekova M; Szlendak T; Timmermans B; Tooke W; Tsaousis I; Tungaraza FS; van Overwalle F; Vandermassen G; Vanhoomissen T; Vanwesenbeeck I; Vasey PL; Verissimo J; Voracek M; Wan WW; Wang TW; Weiss P; Wijaya A; Woertman L; Youn G; Zupanèiè A;
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Apr; 86(4):560-84. PubMed ID: 15053706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.
    Gobrogge KL; Perkins PS; Baker JH; Balcer KD; Breedlove SM; Klump KL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Oct; 36(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 17674179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characteristics of the ideal sex partner: gender differences and perceptions of the preferences of the other gender.
    McGuirl KE; Wiederman MW
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2000; 26(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 10782447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mate Preferences and Their Behavioral Manifestations.
    Buss DM; Schmitt DP
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2019 Jan; 70():77-110. PubMed ID: 30230999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty.
    Rhodes G
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2006; 57():199-226. PubMed ID: 16318594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What motivates the sexual double standard? More support for male versus female control theory.
    Rudman LA; Fetterolf JC; Sanchez DT
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Feb; 39(2):250-63. PubMed ID: 23386660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cultural variations in the sexual marketplace: gender equality correlates with more sexual activity.
    Baumeister RF; Mendoza JP
    J Soc Psychol; 2011; 151(3):350-60. PubMed ID: 21675186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.
    Li NP; Yong JC; Tov W; Sng O; Fletcher GJ; Valentine KA; Jiang YF; Balliet D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):757-76. PubMed ID: 23915041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing implicit mate preferences among Chinese and Japanese women by providing love, sex, or money cues.
    Jin Z; Shiomura K; Jiang L
    Psychol Rep; 2015 Feb; 116(1):195-206. PubMed ID: 25588065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex differences in personality traits and gender-related occupational preferences across 53 nations: testing evolutionary and social-environmental theories.
    Lippa RA
    Arch Sex Behav; 2010 Jun; 39(3):619-36. PubMed ID: 18712468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evolutionary psychology of human mating: a response to Buller's critique.
    Klasios J
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2014 Sep; 47 Pt A():1-11. PubMed ID: 24927270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Big two personality and big three mate preferences: similarity attracts, but country-level mate preferences crucially matter.
    Gebauer JE; Leary MR; Neberich W
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Dec; 38(12):1579-93. PubMed ID: 22956293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexism and gender inequality across 57 societies.
    Brandt MJ
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1413-8. PubMed ID: 21987694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of a parenting prime on sex differences in mate selection criteria.
    Millar MG; Ostlund NM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1459-68. PubMed ID: 17030888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Netflix and Chill? What Sex Differences Can Tell Us About Mate Preferences in (Hypothetical) Booty-Call Relationships.
    March E; Van Doorn G; Grieve R
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(4):1474704918812138. PubMed ID: 30428700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.