These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22933488)

  • 21. Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series.
    Daniel J; Pradhan C; Ziaee H; Pynsent PB; McMinn DJ
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Oct; 96-B(10):1298-306. PubMed ID: 25274912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA; Wisk LE
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2663-71. PubMed ID: 21084576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Results of the First U.S. FDA-Approved Hip Resurfacing Device at 10-Year Follow-up.
    Su EP; Ho H; Bhal V; Housman LR; Masonis JL; Noble JW; Hopper RH; Engh CA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Jul; 103(14):1303-1311. PubMed ID: 33999875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Poor 10-year survivorship of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Seppänen M; Karvonen M; Virolainen P; Remes V; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Liukas A; Mäkelä KT
    Acta Orthop; 2016 Dec; 87(6):554-559. PubMed ID: 27759474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: A Single Surgeon Series Reported at a Minimum of 10 Years Follow-Up.
    Mehra A; Berryman F; Matharu GS; Pynsent PB; Isbister ES
    J Arthroplasty; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1160-6. PubMed ID: 25769743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. High revision rate at 5 years after hip resurfacing with the Durom implant.
    Naal FD; Pilz R; Munzinger U; Hersche O; Leunig M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Sep; 469(9):2598-604. PubMed ID: 21279484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Birmingham hip resurfacing in patients who are seventy years of age or older.
    Carrothers AD; Gilbert RE; Richardson JB
    Hip Int; 2011; 21(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 21462151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mid-Term Results and Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing.
    Oak SR; Strnad GJ; O'Rourke C; Higuera CA; Spindler KP; Brooks PJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27480827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Implant failure in bilateral metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties: a clinical and pathological study.
    Uchihara Y; Grammatopoulos G; Munemoto M; Matharu G; Inagaki Y; Pandit H; Tanaka Y; Athanasou NA
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2018 Mar; 29(3):28. PubMed ID: 29516273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of head size and sex on the outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing.
    McBryde CW; Theivendran K; Thomas AM; Treacy RB; Pynsent PB
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Jan; 92(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 20048102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What is the midterm survivorship and function after hip resurfacing?
    Rahman L; Muirhead-Allwood SK; Alkinj M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 468(12):3221-7. PubMed ID: 20574804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intraoperative Complications and Mid-Term Follow-Up of Large-Diameter Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.
    Miettinen SSA; Mäkinen TJ; Mäkelä K; Huhtala H; Kettunen JS; Remes V
    Scand J Surg; 2018 Jun; 107(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 29333941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Metal ion levels from well-functioning Birmingham Hip Resurfacings decline significantly at ten years.
    Van Der Straeten C; Van Quickenborne D; De Roest B; Calistri A; Victor J; De Smet K
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Oct; 95-B(10):1332-8. PubMed ID: 24078528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data.
    Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Porter ML; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 22628587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hip resurfacing before 50years of age: A prospective study of 979 hips with a mean follow-up of 5.1years.
    Girard J; Lons A; Ramdane N; Putman S
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 May; 104(3):295-299. PubMed ID: 29277514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in Patients 55 Years or Younger: Risk Factors for Poor Midterm Outcomes.
    Halawi MJ; Brigati D; Messner W; Brooks PJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1880-1883. PubMed ID: 28108170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
    Smith AJ; Dieppe P; Howard PW; Blom AW;
    Lancet; 2012 Nov; 380(9855):1759-66. PubMed ID: 23036895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Short-term Results of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in the United States.
    Nam D; Nunley RM; Ruh EL; Engh CA; Rogerson JS; Brooks PJ; Raterman SJ; Su EP; Barrack RL
    Orthopedics; 2015 Aug; 38(8):e715-21. PubMed ID: 26270759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Functional results of isolated femoral revision of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Gilbert RE; Cheung G; Carrothers AD; Meyer C; Richardson JB
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Jul; 92(7):1600-4. PubMed ID: 20595565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with large diameter metal-on-metal heads: short-term survivorship of 8059 hips from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Mokka J; Mäkelä KT; Virolainen P; Remes V; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A
    Scand J Surg; 2013; 102(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 23820688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.