These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22933529)

  • 21. Evaluation of the panoramic image formation in different anatomic positions.
    Ladeira DB; Cruz AD; Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Dent J; 2010; 21(5):458-62. PubMed ID: 21180804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of digital panoramic radiography versus cone beam computerized tomography for measuring alveolar bone.
    Tang Z; Liu X; Chen K
    Head Face Med; 2017 Feb; 13(1):2. PubMed ID: 28228135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cross-sectional study of the factors that influence radiographic magnification of implant diameter and length.
    Choi YG; Kim YK; Eckert SE; Shim CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):594-6. PubMed ID: 15346758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of changes in head position on enlargement of structures during panoramic radiography.
    Pfeiffer P; Bewersdorf S; Schmage P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 22299079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of horizontal magnification on panoramic images.
    Raoof M; Haghani J; Ebrahimi M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 24025873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of panoramic and conventional cross-sectional tomography for preoperative selection of implant size.
    Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Gotfredsen E; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Apr; 22(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 21054555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of linear dimensions and angular measurements on panoramic images taken with two machines.
    Razi T; Moslemzade SH; Razi S
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2009; 3(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 23230473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact on perceived root resorption based on the amount of incisal inclination as determined from conventional panoramic radiography.
    Tieu LD; Normando D; Toogood R; Flores-Mir C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):685-91. PubMed ID: 26432324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bone height measurements on panoramic radiographs: the effect of shape and position of edentulous mandibles.
    Batenburg RH; Stellingsma K; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Oct; 84(4):430-5. PubMed ID: 9347510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Panoramic zonography of the midface: a clinician's guide to vertical magnification.
    Carter LC; Dennison M; Carter JM
    Todays FDA; 1990 Dec; 2(12):1C-3C. PubMed ID: 2288785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Magnification rate of digital panoramic radiographs and its effectiveness for pre-operative assessment of dental implants.
    Kim YK; Park JY; Kim SG; Kim JS; Kim JD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Feb; 40(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 21239569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Distortions in panoramic radiographs.
    Yeo DK; Freer TJ; Brockhurst PJ
    Aust Orthod J; 2002 Nov; 18(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 12462686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects.
    Vazquez L; Nizamaldin Y; Combescure C; Nedir R; Bischof M; Dohan Ehrenfest DM; Carrel JP; Belser UC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(2):20110429. PubMed ID: 23360688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Analysis of panoramic cephalometrics using s skeletal cephalostat.
    Alpern MC
    Angle Orthod; 1979 Apr; 49(2):11O-20. PubMed ID: 286563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Measurement accuracy: a comparison of two intra-oral digital radiographic systems, RadioVisiography-S and FlashDent, with analog film.
    Scarfe WC; Norton S; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 9161164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Image shift of intracoronal pins viewed on bite-wing and panoramic radiographs.
    Treasure P; Chandler NP; Wilson CG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jan; 77(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 8108104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The current status of panoramic radiography.
    Hirschmann PN
    Int Dent J; 1987 Mar; 37(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 3294598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measurements of tooth length in panoramic radiographs. 1. The use of indicators.
    Thanyakarn C; Hansen K; Rohlin M; Akesson L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Feb; 21(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 1397447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dimensional accuracy and details of the panoramic cross-sectional tomographic images: an in vitro study.
    Kumar MA; Mody B; Nair GK; Surender LR; Gopal SS; Prasad RV
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 22430700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Size estimation and magnification error in radiographic imaging: implications for classification of arteriovenous malformations.
    Elisevich K; Cunningham IA; Assis L
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1995 Mar; 16(3):531-8. PubMed ID: 7793378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.