211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22934461)
1. Predicting fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients by using 3 dynamic indices: is it all equally effective?
Wacharasint P; Lertamornpong A; Wattanathum A; Wongsa A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 May; 95 Suppl 5():S149-56. PubMed ID: 22934461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation.
Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A prospective clinical study of pleth variability index in prediction of volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
Lu N; Zheng R; Lin H; Yu J; Shao J; Wu X; Wang H
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Jan; 27(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25591431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery.
Zimmermann M; Feibicke T; Keyl C; Prasser C; Moritz S; Graf BM; Wiesenack C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 20035228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation.
Perner A; Faber T
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 Oct; 50(9):1068-73. PubMed ID: 16939480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness during pneumoperitoneum and laparoscopic surgery.
Høiseth LØ; Hoff IE; Myre K; Landsverk SA; Kirkebøen KA
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 Jul; 56(6):777-86. PubMed ID: 22288953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of functional hemodynamic parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness with pulse power analysis in surgical patients.
Cecconi M; Monti G; Hamilton MA; Puntis M; Dawson D; Tuccillo ML; Della Rocca G; Grounds RM; Rhodes A
Minerva Anestesiol; 2012 May; 78(5):527-33. PubMed ID: 22534733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of VTILVOT variation rate on the assessment of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients.
Wang J; Zhou D; Gao Y; Wu Z; Wang X; Lv C
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Nov; 99(47):e22702. PubMed ID: 33217793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of the pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness depends on the perfusion index.
Broch O; Bein B; Gruenewald M; Höcker J; Schöttler J; Meybohm P; Steinfath M; Renner J
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2011 Jul; 55(6):686-93. PubMed ID: 21480831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Stroke volume variation in the evaluation of fluid responsiveness in refractory septic shock].
Zhang HM; Liu DW; Wang XT; Rui X; Wang H; He HW; Liu Y; Chen XK
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 49(7):610-3. PubMed ID: 20979775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model.
Renner J; Gruenewald M; Quaden R; Hanss R; Meybohm P; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Bein B
Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):650-8. PubMed ID: 19114894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-invasive measurements of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in anesthetized patients using the Nexfin blood pressure monitor.
Stens J; Oeben J; Van Dusseldorp AA; Boer C
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26318314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inferior vena cava diameter variation compared with pulse pressure variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis.
Theerawit P; Morasert T; Sutherasan Y
J Crit Care; 2016 Dec; 36():246-251. PubMed ID: 27591389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variation of left ventricular outflow tract velocity and global end-diastolic volume index reliably predict fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgery patients.
Broch O; Renner J; Gruenewald M; Meybohm P; Höcker J; Schöttler J; Steinfath M; Bein B
J Crit Care; 2012 Jun; 27(3):325.e7-13. PubMed ID: 21855280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during different loading conditions in a paediatric animal model.
Renner J; Cavus E; Meybohm P; Gruenewald M; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Boening A; Bein B
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2008 Mar; 52(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 18205899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of responsiveness to an intravenous fluid challenge in patients after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison between arterial pulse pressure variation and digital plethysmographic variability index.
Fischer MO; Pelissier A; Bohadana D; Gérard JL; Hanouz JL; Fellahi JL
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1087-93. PubMed ID: 23992654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pleth variability index is a weak predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients receiving norepinephrine.
Monnet X; Guérin L; Jozwiak M; Bataille A; Julien F; Richard C; Teboul JL
Br J Anaesth; 2013 Feb; 110(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 23103777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
