These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22935081)
1. The necessary distinction between methodology and philosophical assumptions in healthcare research. Mesel T Scand J Caring Sci; 2013 Sep; 27(3):750-6. PubMed ID: 22935081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using mixed methods research designs in health psychology: an illustrated discussion from a pragmatist perspective. Bishop FL Br J Health Psychol; 2015 Feb; 20(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 25405549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Linking aims, paradigm and method in nursing research. Houghton C; Hunter A; Meskell P Nurse Res; 2012; 20(2):34-9. PubMed ID: 23316536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Journeying from the philosophical contemplation of constructivism to the methodological pragmatics of health services research. Appleton JV; King L J Adv Nurs; 2002 Dec; 40(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 12473042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Patton MQ Health Serv Res; 1999 Dec; 34(5 Pt 2):1189-208. PubMed ID: 10591279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Illustrating a novel methodology and paradigm applied to Emergency Department research. Binnie V; Le Brocque R; Jessup M; Johnston ANB J Adv Nurs; 2021 Oct; 77(10):4045-4054. PubMed ID: 34462947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A philosophical analysis of the general methodology of qualitative research: a critical rationalist perspective. Rudnick A Health Care Anal; 2014 Sep; 22(3):245-54. PubMed ID: 22592885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methods, methodological challenges and lesson learned from phenomenological study about OSCE experience: Overview of paradigm-driven qualitative approach in medical education. Ataro G Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2020 Jan; 49():19-23. PubMed ID: 31871678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient-oriented research. Allemang B; Sitter K; Dimitropoulos G Health Expect; 2022 Feb; 25(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 34748689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research. Devers KJ Health Serv Res; 1999 Dec; 34(5 Pt 2):1153-88. PubMed ID: 10591278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Being pragmatic about healthcare complexity: our experiences applying complexity theory and pragmatism to health services research. Long KM; McDermott F; Meadows GN BMC Med; 2018 Jun; 16(1):94. PubMed ID: 29921277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mixed methods research: a design for emergency care research? Cooper S; Porter J; Endacott R Emerg Med J; 2011 Aug; 28(8):682-5. PubMed ID: 20713360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Foucault, the subject and the research interview: a critique of methods. Fadyl JK; Nicholls DA Nurs Inq; 2013 Mar; 20(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 23176320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mixed Methods Research: The "Thing-ness" Problem. Hesse-Biber S Qual Health Res; 2015 Jun; 25(6):775-88. PubMed ID: 25888694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Critical Incident Technique: Method or Methodology? Viergever RF Qual Health Res; 2019 Jun; 29(7):1065-1079. PubMed ID: 30600767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mixed methods research design for pragmatic psychoanalytic studies. Tillman JG; Clemence AJ; Stevens JL J Am Psychoanal Assoc; 2011 Oct; 59(5):1023-40. PubMed ID: 21880844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pragmatism in practice: mixed methods research for physiotherapy. Shaw JA; Connelly DM; Zecevic AA Physiother Theory Pract; 2010 Nov; 26(8):510-8. PubMed ID: 20649500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Qualitative methods in empirical health research. 1. Scientific theory and application]. Dehlholm-Lambertsen B; Maunsbach M Nord Med; 1997 Jan; 112(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 9045207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review. Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Theory and application of research principles and philosophical underpinning for a study utilising interpretative phenomenological analysis. Cuthbertson LM; Robb YA; Blair S Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):e94-e102. PubMed ID: 32052765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]