These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22936130)

  • 1. Acoustic stimulation effect on temporal processing skills in elderly subjects before and after hearing aid fitting.
    Pinheiro MM; Dias KZ; Pereira LD
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2012; 78(4):9-16. PubMed ID: 22936130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS.
    Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):203-18. PubMed ID: 19194292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli.
    Carter L; Dillon H; Seymour J; Seeto M; Van Dun B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):807-22. PubMed ID: 24224988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
    Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of a new hearing aid anti-cardioid directivity pattern.
    Mueller HG; Weber J; Bellanova M
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 21271803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gated auditory speech perception in elderly hearing aid users and elderly normal-hearing individuals: effects of hearing impairment and cognitive capacity.
    Moradi S; Lidestam B; Hällgren M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2014 Jul; 18():. PubMed ID: 25085610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of conventional and in-situ audiometry on participants with varying levels of sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kiessling J; Leifholz M; Unkel S; Pons-Kühnemann J; Jespersen CT; Pedersen JN
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 25597462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory acclimatization and hearing aids: late auditory evoked potentials and speech recognition following unilateral and bilateral amplification.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3560-9. PubMed ID: 24907819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Localization and speech-identification ability of hearing-impaired listeners using phase-preserving amplification.
    Drennan WR; Gatehouse S; Howell P; Van Tasell D; Lund S
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):461-72. PubMed ID: 16230896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of frequency response and aided speech-recognition performance for hearing aids selected by three different prescriptive methods.
    Humes L; Hackett T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1990 Apr; 1(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 2132584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Listener Performance with a Novel Hearing Aid Frequency Lowering Technique.
    Kirby BJ; Kopun JG; Spratford M; Mollak CM; Brennan MA; McCreery RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):810-822. PubMed ID: 28972470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
    Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of tone-vocoding on spatial release from masking for old, hearing-impaired listeners.
    King A; Hopkins K; Plack CJ; Pontoppidan NH; Bramsløw L; Hietkamp RK; Vatti M; Hafez A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2591. PubMed ID: 28464637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Difference in Speech Recognition between a Default and Programmed Telecoil Program.
    Ledda KT; Valente M; Oeding K; Kallogjeri D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jun; 30(6):502-515. PubMed ID: 30461405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech perception and quality of life of open-fit hearing aid users.
    Garcia TM; Jacob RT; Mondelli MF
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2016; 24(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 27383708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Middle ear electromagnetic semi-implantable hearing device: results of the phase II SOUNDTEC direct system clinical trial.
    Hough JV; Matthews P; Wood MW; Dyer RK
    Otol Neurotol; 2002 Nov; 23(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 12438853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.