BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22936215)

  • 1. Identifying ChIP-seq enrichment using MACS.
    Feng J; Liu T; Qin B; Zhang Y; Liu XS
    Nat Protoc; 2012 Sep; 7(9):1728-40. PubMed ID: 22936215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) to analyze short reads generated by sequencing protein-DNA interactions in embryonic stem cells.
    Liu T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1150():81-95. PubMed ID: 24743991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS).
    Zhang Y; Liu T; Meyer CA; Eeckhoute J; Johnson DS; Bernstein BE; Nusbaum C; Myers RM; Brown M; Li W; Liu XS
    Genome Biol; 2008; 9(9):R137. PubMed ID: 18798982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. BroadPeak: a novel algorithm for identifying broad peaks in diffuse ChIP-seq datasets.
    Wang J; Lunyak VV; Jordan IK
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Feb; 29(4):492-3. PubMed ID: 23300134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is this the right normalization? A diagnostic tool for ChIP-seq normalization.
    Angelini C; Heller R; Volkinshtein R; Yekutieli D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 16():150. PubMed ID: 25957089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Software for rapid time dependent ChIP-sequencing analysis (TDCA).
    Myschyshyn M; Farren-Dai M; Chuang TJ; Vocadlo D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):521. PubMed ID: 29178831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using MACS to identify peaks from ChIP-Seq data.
    Feng J; Liu T; Zhang Y
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2011 Jun; Chapter 2():2.14.1-2.14.14. PubMed ID: 21633945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirical methods for controlling false positives and estimating confidence in ChIP-Seq peaks.
    Nix DA; Courdy SJ; Boucher KM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 9():523. PubMed ID: 19061503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential binding and co-binding pattern of FOXA1 and FOXA3 and their relation to H3K4me3 in HepG2 cells revealed by ChIP-seq.
    Motallebipour M; Ameur A; Reddy Bysani MS; Patra K; Wallerman O; Mangion J; Barker MA; McKernan KJ; Komorowski J; Wadelius C
    Genome Biol; 2009; 10(11):R129. PubMed ID: 19919681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reusable, extensible, and modifiable R scripts and Kepler workflows for comprehensive single set ChIP-seq analysis.
    Cormier N; Kolisnik T; Bieda M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jul; 17(1):270. PubMed ID: 27377783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ABC: a tool to identify SNVs causing allele-specific transcription factor binding from ChIP-Seq experiments.
    Bailey SD; Virtanen C; Haibe-Kains B; Lupien M
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(18):3057-9. PubMed ID: 25995231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of ChIP-seq in the discovery of transcription factor binding sites, differential gene regulation mechanism, epigenetic marks and beyond.
    Mundade R; Ozer HG; Wei H; Prabhu L; Lu T
    Cell Cycle; 2014; 13(18):2847-52. PubMed ID: 25486472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of sequencing depth in ChIP-seq experiments.
    Jung YL; Luquette LJ; Ho JW; Ferrari F; Tolstorukov M; Minoda A; Issner R; Epstein CB; Karpen GH; Kuroda MI; Park PJ
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 May; 42(9):e74. PubMed ID: 24598259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PICS: probabilistic inference for ChIP-seq.
    Zhang X; Robertson G; Krzywinski M; Ning K; Droit A; Jones S; Gottardo R
    Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):151-63. PubMed ID: 20528864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. histoneHMM: Differential analysis of histone modifications with broad genomic footprints.
    Heinig M; Colomé-Tatché M; Taudt A; Rintisch C; Schafer S; Pravenec M; Hubner N; Vingron M; Johannes F
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16():60. PubMed ID: 25884684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel statistical method for quantitative comparison of multiple ChIP-seq datasets.
    Chen L; Wang C; Qin ZS; Wu H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jun; 31(12):1889-96. PubMed ID: 25682068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. HiChIP: a high-throughput pipeline for integrative analysis of ChIP-Seq data.
    Yan H; Evans J; Kalmbach M; Moore R; Middha S; Luban S; Wang L; Bhagwate A; Li Y; Sun Z; Chen X; Kocher JP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Aug; 15(1):280. PubMed ID: 25128017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic evaluation of factors influencing ChIP-seq fidelity.
    Chen Y; Negre N; Li Q; Mieczkowska JO; Slattery M; Liu T; Zhang Y; Kim TK; He HH; Zieba J; Ruan Y; Bickel PJ; Myers RM; Wold BJ; White KP; Lieb JD; Liu XS
    Nat Methods; 2012 Jun; 9(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 22522655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. RECAP reveals the true statistical significance of ChIP-seq peak calls.
    Chitpin JG; Awdeh A; Perkins TJ
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 35(19):3592-3598. PubMed ID: 30824903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Triform algorithm: improved sensitivity and specificity in ChIP-Seq peak finding.
    Kornacker K; Rye MB; Håndstad T; Drabløs F
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():176. PubMed ID: 22827163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 63.