BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22936920)

  • 1. Linear deterministic accumulator models of simple choice.
    Heathcote A; Love J
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():292. PubMed ID: 22936920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accumulating advantages: A new conceptualization of rapid multiple choice.
    van Ravenzwaaij D; Brown SD; Marley AAJ; Heathcote A
    Psychol Rev; 2020 Mar; 127(2):186-215. PubMed ID: 31580104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: different models for response time with different conclusions about psychological mechanisms?
    Heathcote A; Hayes B
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Jun; 66(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 22686161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation.
    Brown SD; Heathcote A
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 Nov; 57(3):153-78. PubMed ID: 18243170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decision processes and the slowing of simple choices in schizophrenia.
    Heathcote A; Suraev A; Curley S; Gong Q; Love J; Michie PT
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2015 Nov; 124(4):961-974. PubMed ID: 26595475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling the effects of methylphenidate on interference and evidence accumulation processes using the conflict linear ballistic accumulator.
    Weigard A; Heathcote A; Sripada C
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2019 Aug; 236(8):2501-2512. PubMed ID: 31302719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A parallel accumulator model accounts for decision randomness when deciding on risky prospects with different expected value.
    Howlett JR; Paulus MP
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0233761. PubMed ID: 32702026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unfalsifiability and mutual translatability of major modeling schemes for choice reaction time.
    Jones M; Dzhafarov EN
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jan; 121(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 24079307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic models of choice.
    Heathcote A; Lin YS; Reynolds A; Strickland L; Gretton M; Matzke D
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):961-985. PubMed ID: 29959755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of drift diffusion and linear ballistic accumulator models in a reward maximization perceptual choice task.
    Goldfarb S; Leonard NE; Simen P; Caicedo-Núñez CH; Holmes P
    Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():148. PubMed ID: 25140124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Capturing Dynamic Performance in a Cognitive Model: Estimating ACT-R Memory Parameters With the Linear Ballistic Accumulator.
    van der Velde M; Sense F; Borst JP; van Maanen L; van Rijn H
    Top Cogn Sci; 2022 Oct; 14(4):889-903. PubMed ID: 35531959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayes factors for the linear ballistic accumulator model of decision-making.
    Evans NJ; Brown SD
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):589-603. PubMed ID: 28455795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evidence accumulation model of perceptual discrimination with naturalistic stimuli.
    Palada H; Searston RA; Persson A; Ballard T; Thompson MB
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Dec; 26(4):671-691. PubMed ID: 32378930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Lognormal Race: A Cognitive-Process Model of Choice and Latency with Desirable Psychometric Properties.
    Rouder JN; Province JM; Morey RD; Gomez P; Heathcote A
    Psychometrika; 2015 Jun; 80(2):491-513. PubMed ID: 24522340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Getting more from accuracy and response time data: methods for fitting the linear ballistic accumulator.
    Donkin C; Averell L; Brown S; Heathcote A
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1095-110. PubMed ID: 19897817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linear Ballistic Accumulator Modeling of Attentional Bias Modification Revealed Disturbed Evidence Accumulation of Negative Information by Explicit Instruction.
    Nishiguchi Y; Sakamoto J; Kunisato Y; Takano K
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2447. PubMed ID: 31787909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the practical differences between model selection methods in inferences about choice response time tasks.
    Evans NJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1070-1098. PubMed ID: 30783896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrating cognitive process and descriptive models of attitudes and preferences.
    Hawkins GE; Marley AA; Heathcote A; Flynn TN; Louviere JJ; Brown SD
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(4):701-35. PubMed ID: 24124986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The EZ diffusion model provides a powerful test of simple empirical effects.
    van Ravenzwaaij D; Donkin C; Vandekerckhove J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):547-556. PubMed ID: 27352898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analyzability, ad hoc restrictions, and excessive flexibility of evidence-accumulation models: reply to two critical commentaries.
    Jones M; Dzhafarov EN
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Oct; 121(4):689-95. PubMed ID: 25347315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.