These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22937799)

  • 1. Detection of transcribed seal impressions using 3-D pressure traces.
    Lee J; Kong SG; Lee YS; Kim JS; Jung NE
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Nov; 57(6):1531-6. PubMed ID: 22937799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forged seal detection based on the seal overlay metric.
    Lee J; Kong SG; Lee YS; Moon KW; Jeon OY; Han JH; Lee BW; Seo JS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jan; 214(1-3):200-6. PubMed ID: 21890293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sequence discrimination of heterogeneous crossing of seal impression and ink-printed text using adhesive tapes.
    Lee KY; Lee J; Kong SG; Kim B
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jan; 234():120-5. PubMed ID: 24378311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A study on the use of photopolymer reflex plate in the forgery of Chinese seals.
    Cheng KC; Cheng N; Wei YC
    J Forensic Sci; 2000 Sep; 45(5):1062-70. PubMed ID: 11005181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the effects of different methods of impression build-up on earmoulds.
    Macrae JH
    Br J Audiol; 1991 Jun; 25(3):183-99. PubMed ID: 1873585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Static pressure seal of earmolds.
    Macrae J
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1990; 27(4):397-410. PubMed ID: 2089150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation and comparison of the electrostatic dust print lifter and the electrostatic detection apparatus on the development of footwear impressions on paper.
    Craig CL; Hornsby BM; Riles M
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jul; 51(4):819-26. PubMed ID: 16882226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of factors affecting the accuracy of impressions using quantitative surface analysis.
    Lee IK; DeLong R; Pintado MR; Malik R
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(6):246-52. PubMed ID: 8710707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation.
    Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional accuracy of a single tooth captured by elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study.
    Schaefer O; Schmidt M; Goebel R; Kuepper H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 22944312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Controlling the variable of pressure in the production of test footwear impressions.
    Farrugia KJ; Riches P; Bandey H; Savage K; NicDaéid N
    Sci Justice; 2012 Sep; 52(3):168-76. PubMed ID: 22841140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pressure control for complete denture impressions.
    Weng BX; Khlevnoy V
    Oral Health; 1995 Nov; 85(11):21-3, 24, 27. PubMed ID: 8779757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dating of inkpad seals using the extraction rate method: preliminary findings.
    Li B; Bai F; Mu H; Bao R
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 May; 59(3):793-9. PubMed ID: 24502316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trace element analysis in the serum and hair of Antarctic leopard seal, Hydrurga leptonyx, and Weddell seal, Leptonychotes weddellii.
    Gray R; Canfield P; Rogers T
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Jul; 399(1-3):202-15. PubMed ID: 18486190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface detail reproduction under simulated pulpal pressure: a 3-dimensional optical profilometer and scanning electron microscopy evaluation.
    Acar O; Erkut S; Lakshmipathy M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):102-13. PubMed ID: 22867807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phocid seals, seal lice and heartworms: a terrestrial host-parasite system conveyed to the marine environment.
    Leidenberger S; Harding K; Härkönen T
    Dis Aquat Organ; 2007 Oct; 77(3):235-53. PubMed ID: 18062474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations.
    Quaas S; Rudolph H; Luthardt RG
    J Dent; 2007 Dec; 35(12):903-8. PubMed ID: 17980951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.