136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22937891)
21. Very low human Papillomavirus DNA prevalence in mature women with negative computer-imaged liquid-based Pap tests.
Zhao C; Elishaev E; Yuan KH; Yu J; Austin RM
Cancer; 2007 Oct; 111(5):292-7. PubMed ID: 17879368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Becton Dickinson FocalPoint GS Imaging System: clinical trials demonstrate significantly improved sensitivity for the detection of important cervical lesions.
Wilbur DC; Black-Schaffer WS; Luff RD; Abraham KP; Kemper C; Molina JT; Tench WD
Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Nov; 132(5):767-75. PubMed ID: 19846820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Liquid-based cervical cytology.
Klinkhamer PJ; Meerding WJ; Rosier PF; Hanselaar AG
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):263-71. PubMed ID: 14579292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Applicative aspects of liquid-based cytology in cervical cancer screening].
Liverani M; De Paola F; Danesi S; Fedriga R; Dalbuoni V; Agnoletti R; Amadori AR; Mirra F; Bonoli W; Saragoni L
Pathologica; 2006 Dec; 98(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 17285839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Automated screening versus manual screening: a comparison of the ThinPrep imaging system and manual screening in a time study.
Schledermann D; Hyldebrandt T; Ejersbo D; Hoelund B
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Jun; 35(6):348-52. PubMed ID: 17497655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Rapid pre-screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control in a cervical screening programme.
Tavares SB; de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG
Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 18476988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Are significant numbers of abnormal cells lost on the discarded ThinPrep® broom when used for cervical cytology?
Umana A; Dunsmore H; Herbert A; Jokhan A; Kubba A
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):228-34. PubMed ID: 23171273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Does use of the AutoPap assisted primary screener improve cytologic diagnosis?
Bibbo M; Hawthorne C; Zimmerman B
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9987445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice.
Wilbur DC; Prey MU; Miller WM; Pawlick GF; Colgan TJ
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 9479343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the grading of squamous cell dyskaryosis, as the British Society for Clinical Cytology definitions require amendment.
Slater DN; Rice S; Stewart R; Melling SE; Hewer EM; Smith JH
Cytopathology; 2005 Aug; 16(4):179-92. PubMed ID: 16048504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. HSIL, epithelial cell abnormality-adjusted workload, and the Thinprep imaging system.
Renshaw AA; Elsheikh TM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Mar; 40(3):201-3. PubMed ID: 22334521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of ThinPrep Integrated Imager-Assisted Screening versus Manual Screening of ThinPrep Liquid-Based Cytology Specimens.
Tanaka K; Aoki D; Tozawa-Ono A; Suzuki N; Takamatsu K; Nakamura M; Tsunoda H; Seino S; Kobayashi N; Shirayama T; Takahashi F
Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(5):486-491. PubMed ID: 32535593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. ThinPrep® imaging system-assisted vs manual screening of urinary cytology slides in the detection of the "suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma" category.
Piaton E; Prat JJ; Nennig C; Hutin K; Colombel M; Ruffion A
Cytopathology; 2022 Nov; 33(6):716-724. PubMed ID: 36004492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Review of cytology and histopathology as part of the NHS Cervical Screening Programme audit of invasive cervical cancers.
Castanon A; Ferryman S; Patnick J; Sasieni P
Cytopathology; 2012 Feb; 23(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 22243289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. 100% rapid rescreening for quality assurance in a quality control program in a public health cytologic laboratory.
Mattosinho de Castro Ferraz Mda G; Dall' Agnol M; di Loreto C; Pirani WM; Utagawa ML; Pereira SM; Sakai YI; Feres CL; Shih LW; Yamamoto LS; Rodrigues RO; Shirata NK; Longatta Filho A
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 16450904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of SurePath® and ThinPrep® liquid-based cervical cytology using positive predictive value, atypical predictive value and total predictive value as performance indicators.
Wright PK; Marshall J; Desai M
Cytopathology; 2010 Dec; 21(6):374-8. PubMed ID: 20545727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Utility of the Thin Prep Imaging System® in the detection of squamous intraepithelial abnormalities on retrospective evaluation: can we trust the imager?
Barroeta JE; Reilly ME; Steinhoff MM; Lawrence WD
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Feb; 40(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 22246928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance of rapid prescreening and 100% rapid review as internal quality control methods for cervical cytopathology.
Tobias AHG; Vitalino AC; Rezende MT; Oliveira RRR; Coura-Vital W; Amaral RG; Carneiro CM
Cytopathology; 2018 Oct; 29(5):428-435. PubMed ID: 29904955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of the sensitivity of conventional cytology and the ThinPrep Imaging System for 1,083 biopsy confirmed high-grade squamous lesions.
Halford JA; Batty T; Boost T; Duhig J; Hall J; Lee C; Walker K
Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 May; 38(5):318-26. PubMed ID: 19813268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Concordance between original screening and final diagnosis using imager vs. manual screen of cervical liquid-based cytology slides.
Pacheco MC; Conley RC; Pennington DW; Bishop JW
Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(5):575-8. PubMed ID: 18833820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
