129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22938153)
1. Stochastic errors vs. modeling errors in distance based phylogenetic reconstructions.
Doerr D; Gronau I; Moran S; Yavneh I
Algorithms Mol Biol; 2012 Aug; 7(1):22. PubMed ID: 22938153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptive distance measures for resolving K2P quartets: metric separation versus stochastic noise.
Gronau I; Moran S; Yavneh I
J Comput Biol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1509-18. PubMed ID: 20575667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance comparison between k-tuple distance and four model-based distances in phylogenetic tree reconstruction.
Yang K; Zhang L
Nucleic Acids Res; 2008 Mar; 36(5):e33. PubMed ID: 18296485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Towards optimal distance functions for stochastic substitution models.
Gronau I; Moran S; Yavneh I
J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 19501101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing evolutionary distances via adaptive distance functions.
Damti Y; Gronau I; Moran S; Yavneh I
J Theor Biol; 2018 Mar; 440():88-99. PubMed ID: 29277603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Theoretical foundation to estimate the relative efficiencies of the Jukes-Cantor+gamma model and the Jukes-Cantor model in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
Som A
Gene; 2006 Dec; 385():103-10. PubMed ID: 16979305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When is it safe to use an oversimplified substitution model in tree-making?
Rzhetsky A; Sitnikova T
Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Nov; 13(9):1255-65. PubMed ID: 8896378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Disk-covering, a fast-converging method for phylogenetic tree reconstruction.
Huson DH; Nettles SM; Warnow TJ
J Comput Biol; 1999; 6(3-4):369-86. PubMed ID: 10582573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences based on the distribution of substitution rates among sites as estimated by parsimony.
Tourasse NJ; Gouy M
Mol Biol Evol; 1997 Mar; 14(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 9066796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data.
Nei M; Tajima F; Tateno Y
J Mol Evol; 1983; 19(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 6571220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of two methods for constructing evolutionary distances from a weighted contribution of transition and transversion differences.
Pollock DD; Goldstein DB
Mol Biol Evol; 1995 Jul; 12(4):713-7. PubMed ID: 7659024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The gene tree delusion.
Springer MS; Gatesy J
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phylogenetic Tree Estimation With and Without Alignment: New Distance Methods and Benchmarking.
Bogusz M; Whelan S
Syst Biol; 2017 Mar; 66(2):218-231. PubMed ID: 27633353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A stochastic local search algorithm for distance-based phylogeny reconstruction.
Tria F; Caglioti E; Loreto V; Pagnani A
Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Nov; 27(11):2587-95. PubMed ID: 20562341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Theoretical and Practical Considerations when using Retroelement Insertions to Estimate Species Trees in the Anomaly Zone.
Molloy EK; Gatesy J; Springer MS
Syst Biol; 2022 Apr; 71(3):721-740. PubMed ID: 34677617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unbiased estimation of evolutionary distance between nucleotide sequences.
Tajima F
Mol Biol Evol; 1993 May; 10(3):677-88. PubMed ID: 8336549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficient biased estimation of evolutionary distances when substitution rates vary across sites.
Guindon S; Gascuel O
Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Apr; 19(4):534-43. PubMed ID: 11919295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A sharp error probability estimate for the reconstruction of phylogenetic quartets by the four-point method.
Lacey MR; Calmes J
J Comput Biol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):443-56. PubMed ID: 19254183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Twisted trees and inconsistency of tree estimation when gaps are treated as missing data - The impact of model mis-specification in distance corrections.
McTavish EJ; Steel M; Holder MT
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Dec; 93():289-95. PubMed ID: 26256643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy guarantees for phylogeny reconstruction algorithms based on balanced minimum evolution.
Bordewich M; Mihaescu R
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(3):576-83. PubMed ID: 24091392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
