272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22938355)
1. A quantitative comparison of mechanical blood damage parameters in rotary ventricular assist devices: shear stress, exposure time and hemolysis index.
Fraser KH; Zhang T; Taskin ME; Griffith BP; Wu ZJ
J Biomech Eng; 2012 Aug; 134(8):081002. PubMed ID: 22938355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flow features and device-induced blood trauma in CF-VADs under a pulsatile blood flow condition: A CFD comparative study.
Chen Z; Jena SK; Giridharan GA; Koenig SC; Slaughter MS; Griffith BP; Wu ZJ
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2018 Feb; 34(2):. PubMed ID: 28859253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-indicator analysis of mechanical blood damage with five clinical ventricular assist devices.
Li Y; Wang H; Xi Y; Sun A; Deng X; Chen Z; Fan Y
Comput Biol Med; 2022 Dec; 151(Pt A):106271. PubMed ID: 36347061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and validation of a mathematical model for evaluating shear-induced damage of von Willebrand factor.
Li Y; Xi Y; Wang H; Sun A; Wang L; Deng X; Chen Z; Fan Y
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Sep; 164():107379. PubMed ID: 37597407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shear Stress-Induced Total Blood Trauma in Multiple Species.
Chan CHH; Pieper IL; Robinson CR; Friedmann Y; Kanamarlapudi V; Thornton CA
Artif Organs; 2017 Oct; 41(10):934-947. PubMed ID: 28744884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Numerical Analysis of Blood Damage Potential of the HeartMate II and HeartWare HVAD Rotary Blood Pumps.
Thamsen B; Blümel B; Schaller J; Paschereit CO; Affeld K; Goubergrits L; Kertzscher U
Artif Organs; 2015 Aug; 39(8):651-9. PubMed ID: 26234447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computational characterization of flow and blood damage potential of the new maglev CH-VAD pump versus the HVAD and HeartMate II pumps.
Zhang J; Chen Z; Griffith BP; Wu ZJ
Int J Artif Organs; 2020 Oct; 43(10):653-662. PubMed ID: 32043405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A mathematical model for assessing shear induced bleeding risk.
Li Y; Wang H; Xi Y; Sun A; Wang L; Deng X; Chen Z; Fan Y
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Apr; 231():107390. PubMed ID: 36745955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lactic Dehydrogenase in the In Vitro Evaluation of Hemolytic Properties of Ventricular Assist Device.
Li D; Wu Q; Liu S; Chen Y; Chen H; Ruan Y; Zhang Y
Artif Organs; 2017 Nov; 41(11):E274-E284. PubMed ID: 28722142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of shear stress on the size, structure, and function of human von Willebrand factor.
Chan CH; Pieper IL; Fleming S; Friedmann Y; Foster G; Hawkins K; Thornton CA; Kanamarlapudi V
Artif Organs; 2014 Sep; 38(9):741-50. PubMed ID: 25234758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shear stress evaluation on blood cells using computational fluid dynamics.
Mitoh A; Suebe Y; Kashima T; Koyabu E; Sobu E; Okamoto E; Mitamura Y; Nishimura I
Biomed Mater Eng; 2020; 31(3):169-178. PubMed ID: 32597794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Normal fluid stresses are prevalent in rotary ventricular assist devices: A computational fluid dynamics analysis.
Khoo DP; Cookson AN; Gill HS; Fraser KH
Int J Artif Organs; 2018 Nov; 41(11):738-751. PubMed ID: 30141359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of shear stress related hemolysis in a ventricular assist device.
Bounouib M; Benakrach H; Taha-Janan M; Maazouzi W
Biomed Mater Eng; 2023; 34(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 35988210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A New Mathematical Numerical Model to Evaluate the Risk of Thrombosis in Three Clinical Ventricular Assist Devices.
Li Y; Wang H; Xi Y; Sun A; Deng X; Chen Z; Fan Y
Bioengineering (Basel); 2022 May; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 35735478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of blood viscosity on shear-induced hemolysis using a magnetically levitated shearing device.
Krisher JA; Malinauskas RA; Day SW
Artif Organs; 2022 Jun; 46(6):1027-1039. PubMed ID: 35030287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computational fluid dynamics analysis of blade tip clearances on hemodynamic performance and blood damage in a centrifugal ventricular assist device.
Wu J; Paden BE; Borovetz HS; Antaki JF
Artif Organs; 2010 May; 34(5):402-11. PubMed ID: 19832736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Circulatory loop design and components introduce artifacts impacting in vitro evaluation of ventricular assist device thrombogenicity: A call for caution.
Li M; Walk R; Roka-Moiia Y; Sheriff J; Bluestein D; Barth EJ; Slepian MJ
Artif Organs; 2020 Jun; 44(6):E226-E237. PubMed ID: 31876310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computational fluid dynamics analysis to determine shear stresses and rates in a centrifugal left ventricular assist device.
Selgrade BP; Truskey GA
Artif Organs; 2012 Apr; 36(4):E89-96. PubMed ID: 22360826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The CentriMag centrifugal blood pump as a benchmark for in vitro testing of hemocompatibility in implantable ventricular assist devices.
Chan CH; Pieper IL; Hambly R; Radley G; Jones A; Friedmann Y; Hawkins KM; Westaby S; Foster G; Thornton CA
Artif Organs; 2015 Feb; 39(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 25066768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hemodynamic investigation and in vitro evaluation of a novel mixed-flow blood pump.
Qu Y; Guo Z; Zhang J; Li G; Zhang S; Li D
Artif Organs; 2022 Aug; 46(8):1533-1543. PubMed ID: 35167128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
