348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22938777)
1. Differences in reported esophageal cancer resection outcomes between national clinical and administrative databases.
Lapar DJ; Stukenborg GJ; Lau CL; Jones DR; Kozower BD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1152-7. PubMed ID: 22938777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database: establishing generalizability to national lung cancer resection outcomes.
LaPar DJ; Bhamidipati CM; Lau CL; Jones DR; Kozower BD
Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Jul; 94(1):216-21; discussion 221. PubMed ID: 22608716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals: effect of operative approach and hospital-level variation.
Merkow RP; Bilimoria KY; McCarter MD; Phillips JD; DeCamp MM; Sherman KL; Ko CY; Bentrem DJ
Arch Surg; 2012 Nov; 147(11):1009-16. PubMed ID: 23165615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hospital esophageal cancer resection volume does not predict patient mortality risk.
Kozower BD; Stukenborg GJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 May; 93(5):1690-6; discussion 1696-8. PubMed ID: 22541199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discussion.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1157-9. PubMed ID: 22938778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of partial versus total esophagectomy in the United States.
Jafari MD; Halabi WJ; Smith BR; Nguyen VQ; Phelan MJ; Stamos MJ; Nguyen NT
Ann Surg; 2013 Sep; 258(3):450-8. PubMed ID: 24022437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database 2017 Update on Outcomes and Quality.
Seder CW; Raymond DP; Wright CD; Gaissert HA; Chang AC; Clinton S; Becker S; Fernandez FG; Kozower BD
Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 May; 103(5):1378-1383. PubMed ID: 28431693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating parsimonious risk-adjustment models for comparing hospital outcomes with vascular surgery.
Osborne NH; Ko CY; Upchurch GR; Dimick JB
J Vasc Surg; 2010 Aug; 52(2):400-5. PubMed ID: 20670776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nationwide Inpatient Sample and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program give different results in hip fracture studies.
Bohl DD; Basques BA; Golinvaux NS; Baumgaertner MR; Grauer JN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1672-80. PubMed ID: 24615426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidence and risk factors for respiratory complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy for malignancy: a NSQIP analysis.
Molena D; Mungo B; Stem M; Lidor AO
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014; 26(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 25837540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of surgeon demographics and technique on outcomes after esophageal resections: a nationwide study.
Gopaldas RR; Bhamidipati CM; Dao TK; Markley JG
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Mar; 95(3):1064-9. PubMed ID: 23261119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Operative outcomes in mitral valve surgery: combined effect of surgeon and hospital volume in a population-based analysis.
Kilic A; Shah AS; Conte JV; Baumgartner WA; Yuh DD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Sep; 146(3):638-46. PubMed ID: 22914251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of Outcomes After TKA: Do All Databases Produce Similar Findings?
Bedard NA; Pugely AJ; McHugh M; Lux N; Otero JE; Bozic KJ; Gao Y; Callaghan JJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jan; 476(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 29529616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hospital and surgeon volume in relation to survival after esophageal cancer surgery in a population-based study.
Derogar M; Sadr-Azodi O; Johar A; Lagergren P; Lagergren J
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Feb; 31(5):551-7. PubMed ID: 23295792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Penetration, Completeness, and Representativeness of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database for Lobectomy.
Tong BC; Kim S; Kosinski A; Onaitis MW; Boffa DJ; Habib RH; Putnam JB; Furnary AP; Cowper P; Wright CD; Jacobs JP; Fernandez FG
Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Mar; 107(3):897-902. PubMed ID: 30253162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality, not volume, determines outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery in a university-based community hospital network.
Kurlansky PA; Argenziano M; Dunton R; Lancey R; Nast E; Stewart A; Williams T; Zapolanski A; Chang H; Tingley J; Smith CR
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Feb; 143(2):287-93. PubMed ID: 22104669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of hospital volume on clinical outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis, based on a national administrative database.
Murata A; Matsuda S; Mayumi T; Yokoe M; Kuwabara K; Ichimiya Y; Fujino Y; Kubo T; Fujimori K; Horiguchi H
Pancreas; 2011 Oct; 40(7):1018-23. PubMed ID: 21926541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association of procedure volume with radical cystectomy outcomes in a nationwide database.
Barbieri CE; Lee B; Cookson MS; Bingham J; Clark PE; Smith JA; Chang SS
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1418-21; discussion 1421-2. PubMed ID: 17706712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A surgeon's case volume of oesophagectomy for cancer does not influence patient outcome in a high volume hospital.
Jeganathan R; Kinnear H; Campbell J; Jordan S; Graham A; Gavin A; McManus K; McGuigan J
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 9(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 19359284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Missing data and interpretation of cancer surgery outcomes at the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Parsons HM; Henderson WG; Ziegenfuss JY; Davern M; Al-Refaie WB
J Am Coll Surg; 2011 Sep; 213(3):379-91. PubMed ID: 21700480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
