BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22939940)

  • 1. Applicability of in vitro tests for skin irritation and corrosion to regulatory classification schemes: substantiating test strategies with data from routine studies.
    Kolle SN; Sullivan KM; Mehling A; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Dec; 64(3):402-14. PubMed ID: 22939940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Erratum to "Applicability of in vitro tests for skin irritation and corrosion to regulatory classification schemes: substantiating test strategies with data from routine studies" [Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. (2012) 402-414].
    Kolle SN; Sullivan KM; Mehling A; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Apr; 65(3):366-78. PubMed ID: 23646360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regulatory accepted but out of domain: In vitro skin irritation tests for agrochemical formulations.
    Kolle SN; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Oct; 89():125-130. PubMed ID: 28734851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The EpiOcular™ Eye Irritation Test is the Method of Choice for the In Vitro Eye Irritation Testing of Agrochemical Formulations: Correlation Analysis of EpiOcular Eye Irritation Test and BCOP Test Data According to the UN GHS, US EPA and Brazil ANVISA Classification Schemes.
    Kolle SN; Rey Moreno MC; Mayer W; van Cott A; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Altern Lab Anim; 2015 Jul; 43(3):181-98. PubMed ID: 26256396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. KeraSkin-VM: a novel reconstructed human epidermis model for skin irritation tests.
    Jung KM; Lee SH; Jang WH; Jung HS; Heo Y; Park YH; Bae S; Lim KM; Seok SH
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Aug; 28(5):742-50. PubMed ID: 24625437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An integrated testing strategy for in vitro skin corrosion and irritation assessment using SkinEthic™ Reconstructed Human Epidermis.
    Alépée N; Grandidier MH; Tornier C; Cotovio J
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Oct; 29(7):1779-92. PubMed ID: 26187475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A retrospective analysis of in vivo eye irritation, skin irritation and skin sensitisation studies with agrochemical formulations: Setting the scene for development of alternative strategies.
    Corvaro M; Gehen S; Andrews K; Chatfield R; Macleod F; Mehta J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Oct; 89():131-147. PubMed ID: 28668334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The usefulness of the validated SkinEthic™ RHE test method to identify skin corrosive UN GHS subcategories.
    Alépée N; Robert C; Tornier C; Cotovio J
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Jun; 28(4):616-25. PubMed ID: 24389111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lacking applicability of in vitro eye irritation methods to identify seriously eye irritating agrochemical formulations: Results of bovine cornea opacity and permeability assay, isolated chicken eye test and the EpiOcular™ ET-50 method to classify according to UN GHS.
    Kolle SN; Van Cott A; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Apr; 85():33-47. PubMed ID: 28163171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro skin irritation testing: Improving the sensitivity of the EpiDerm skin irritation test protocol.
    Kandárová H; Hayden P; Klausner M; Kubilus J; Kearney P; Sheasgreen J
    Altern Lab Anim; 2009 Dec; 37(6):671-89. PubMed ID: 20105002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a tiered in vitro testing strategy for assessing the ocular and dermal irritation/corrosion potential of pharmaceutical compounds for worker safety.
    Graham JC; Wilt N; Costin GE; Villano C; Bader J; Krawiec L; Sly E; Gould J
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2018 Dec; 37(4):380-390. PubMed ID: 30035615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of an in vitro corrosion/irritation prediction assay using the EpiDerm skin model.
    Kidd DA; Johnson M; Clements J
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2007 Oct; 21(7):1292-7. PubMed ID: 17936572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eye irritation potential: usefulness of the HET-CAM under the Globally Harmonized System of classification and labeling of chemicals (GHS).
    Scheel J; Kleber M; Kreutz J; Lehringer E; Mehling A; Reisinger K; Steiling W
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Apr; 59(3):471-92. PubMed ID: 21310206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regulatory assessment of in vitro skin corrosion and irritation data within the European framework: Workshop recommendations.
    Eskes C; Detappe V; Koëter H; Kreysa J; Liebsch M; Zuang V; Amcoff P; Barroso J; Cotovio J; Guest R; Hermann M; Hoffmann S; Masson P; Alépée N; Arce LA; Brüschweiler B; Catone T; Cihak R; Clouzeau J; D'Abrosca F; Delveaux C; Derouette JP; Engelking O; Facchini D; Fröhlicher M; Hofmann M; Hopf N; Molinari J; Oberli A; Ott M; Peter R; Sá-Rocha VM; Schenk D; Tomicic C; Vanparys P; Verdon B; Wallenhorst T; Winkler GC; Depallens O
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Mar; 62(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 22085589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new alternative method for testing skin irritation using a human skin model: a pilot study.
    Miles A; Berthet A; Hopf NB; Gilliet M; Raffoul W; Vernez D; Spring P
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Mar; 28(2):240-7. PubMed ID: 24211334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of SARs for the prediction of skin irritation/corrosion potential: structural inclusion rules in the BfR decision support system.
    Saliner AG; Tsakovska I; Pavan M; Patlewicz G; Worth AP
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2007; 18(3-4):331-42. PubMed ID: 17514574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A catch-up validation study on reconstructed human epidermis (SkinEthic RHE) for full replacement of the Draize skin irritation test.
    Alépée N; Tornier C; Robert C; Amsellem C; Roux MH; Doucet O; Pachot J; Méloni M; de Brugerolle de Fraissinette A
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2010 Feb; 24(1):257-66. PubMed ID: 19733228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sub-categorisation of skin corrosive chemicals by the EpiSkin™ reconstructed human epidermis skin corrosion test method according to UN GHS: revision of OECD Test Guideline 431.
    Alépée N; Grandidier MH; Cotovio J;
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Mar; 28(2):131-45. PubMed ID: 24211528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Harmonization of thresholds for primary skin irritation from results of human repeated insult patch tests and laboratory animal skin irritation tests.
    Tardiff RG; Hubner RP; Graves CG
    J Appl Toxicol; 2003; 23(4):279-81. PubMed ID: 12884413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A catch-up validation study of an in vitro skin irritation test method using reconstructed human epidermis LabCyte EPI-MODEL24.
    Kojima H; Katoh M; Shinoda S; Hagiwara S; Suzuki T; Izumi R; Yamaguchi Y; Nakamura M; Kasahawa T; Shibai A
    J Appl Toxicol; 2014 Jul; 34(7):766-74. PubMed ID: 24122860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.