These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22941269)

  • 1. Sex and age differences in mate-selection preferences.
    Schwarz S; Hassebrauck M
    Hum Nat; 2012 Dec; 23(4):447-66. PubMed ID: 22941269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of control of resources on magnitudes of sex differences in human mate preferences.
    Moore F; Cassidy C; Perrett DI
    Evol Psychol; 2010 Dec; 8(4):720-35. PubMed ID: 22947829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intersexual and Intrasexual Differences in Mate Selection Preferences Among Lesbian Women, Gay Men, and Bisexual Women and Men.
    Klümper L; Hassebrauck M; Schwarz S
    Arch Sex Behav; 2024 Jan; 53(1):177-203. PubMed ID: 37558933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-Perceived Mate Value, Facial Attractiveness, and Mate Preferences: Do Desirable Men Want It All?
    Arnocky S
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(1):1474704918763271. PubMed ID: 29534596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Impact of Health, Wealth, and Attractiveness on Romantic Evaluation from Photographs of Faces.
    Tskhay KO; Clout JM; Rule NO
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Nov; 46(8):2365-2376. PubMed ID: 28255792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of Long-Term Mate Preferences in Iran.
    Atari M
    Evol Psychol; 2017; 15(2):1474704917702459. PubMed ID: 28401792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of attractiveness and status in dating desire in homosexual and heterosexual men and women.
    Ha T; van den Berg JE; Engels RC; Lichtwarck-Aschoff A
    Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Jun; 41(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 21979410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What do women's advertised mate preferences reveal? An analysis of video dating profiles.
    Goetz CD
    Evol Psychol; 2013 May; 11(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 23718946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Good mates retain us right: investigating the relationship between mate retention strategies, mate value, and relationship satisfaction.
    Salkicevic S; Stanic AL; Grabovac MT
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Dec; 12(5):1038-52. PubMed ID: 25481238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are Sex Differences in Preferences for Physical Attractiveness and Good Earning Capacity in Potential Mates Smaller in Countries With Greater Gender Equality?
    Zhang L; Lee AJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(2):1474704919852921. PubMed ID: 31146580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Big two personality and big three mate preferences: similarity attracts, but country-level mate preferences crucially matter.
    Gebauer JE; Leary MR; Neberich W
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Dec; 38(12):1579-93. PubMed ID: 22956293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physical attractiveness, attitudes toward career, and mate preferences among young Chinese women.
    Zhang H; Teng F; Chan DK; Zhang D
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Feb; 12(1):97-114. PubMed ID: 24525338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mate retention behavior of men and women in heterosexual and homosexual relationships.
    Vanderlaan DP; Vasey PL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Aug; 37(4):572-85. PubMed ID: 17216358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual orientation and shifts in preferences for a partner's body attributes in short-term versus long-term mating contexts.
    Lucas M; Koff E; Grossmith S; Migliorini R
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Jun; 108(3):699-710. PubMed ID: 21879616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs.
    Li NP; Bailey JM; Kenrick DT; Linsenmeier JA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Jun; 82(6):947-55. PubMed ID: 12051582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for the trajectory of marital satisfaction.
    Meltzer AL; McNulty JK; Jackson GL; Karney BR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Mar; 106(3):418-28. PubMed ID: 24128188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sociosexual attitudes and dyadic sexual desire independently predict women's preferences for male vocal masculinity.
    O'Connor JJ; Jones BC; Fraccaro PJ; Tigue CC; Pisanski K; Feinberg DR
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Oct; 43(7):1343-53. PubMed ID: 24830906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.
    Gobrogge KL; Perkins PS; Baker JH; Balcer KD; Breedlove SM; Klump KL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Oct; 36(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 17674179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex and Sexual Orientation Differences in Sexuality and Mate Choice Criteria.
    Kostic B; Scofield JE
    Arch Sex Behav; 2022 Aug; 51(6):2855-2865. PubMed ID: 35590034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age Limits.
    Antfolk J
    Evol Psychol; 2017 Mar; 15(1):1474704917690401. PubMed ID: 28127998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.