83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22941869)
1. Comparison of disease prevalence in two populations in the presence of misclassification.
Tang ML; Qiu SF; Poon WY
Biom J; 2012 Nov; 54(6):786-807. PubMed ID: 22941869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sample size determination for disease prevalence studies with partially validated data.
Qiu SF; Poon WY; Tang ML
Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Feb; 25(1):37-63. PubMed ID: 22374341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Test procedures for disease prevalence with partially validated data.
Tang ML; Qiu SF; Poon WY; Tang NS
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(2):368-86. PubMed ID: 22251180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of disease prevalence in two populations under double-sampling scheme with two fallible classifiers.
Qiu SF; He J; Tao JR; Tang ML; Poon WY
J Appl Stat; 2020; 47(8):1375-1401. PubMed ID: 35706696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Homogeneity test of rate ratios in stratified matched-pair studies.
Li HQ; Tang NS
Biom J; 2011 Jul; 53(4):614-27. PubMed ID: 21608010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Homogeneity test of difference between two correlated proportions in stratified matched-pair studies.
Tang NS; Zhang B; Li HQ
J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(6):1261-80. PubMed ID: 24138431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Test procedure and sample size determination for a proportion study using a double-sampling scheme with two fallible classifiers.
Qiu SF; Zeng XS; Tang ML; Poon WY
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Apr; 28(4):1019-1043. PubMed ID: 29233082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A general approach to sample size determination for prevalence surveys that use dual test protocols.
Cheng D; Stamey JD; Branscum AJ
Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):694-706. PubMed ID: 17722203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Homogeneity testing for binomial proportions under stratified double-sampling scheme with two fallible classifiers.
Qiu SF; Fu QX
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Dec; 29(12):3547-3568. PubMed ID: 32640937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian sample size determination for prevalence and diagnostic test studies in the absence of a gold standard test.
Dendukuri N; Rahme E; Bélisle P; Joseph L
Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):388-97. PubMed ID: 15180664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Testing the non-unity of rate ratio under inverse sampling.
Tang ML; Liao YJ; Ng HK; Chan PS
Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(4):551-64. PubMed ID: 17621387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sample size for comparing correlated concordance rates.
Jung SH; Barnhart HX; Sohn I; Stinnett SS; Wallace DK
J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(2):359-69. PubMed ID: 18327726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Statistical inference for correlated data in ophthalmologic studies.
Tang ML; Tang NS; Rosner B
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2771-83. PubMed ID: 16381067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interval estimation for a proportion using a double-sampling scheme with two fallible classifiers.
Qiu SF; Lian H; Zou GY; Zeng XS
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2478-2503. PubMed ID: 27932666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.
Tang ML; Ling MH; Tian GL
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 19035467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sample size for testing difference between two proportions for the bilateral-sample design.
Qiu SF; Tang NS; Tang ML; Pei YB
J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):857-71. PubMed ID: 20183448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of the diagnostic threshold accounting for decision costs and sampling uncertainty.
Skaltsa K; Jover L; Carrasco JL
Biom J; 2010 Oct; 52(5):676-97. PubMed ID: 20976697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two-phase sampling for simultaneous prevalence estimation and case detection.
McNamee R
Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):783-92. PubMed ID: 15339302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Testing approaches for overdispersion in poisson regression versus the generalized poisson model.
Yang Z; Hardin JW; Addy CL; Vuong QH
Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(4):565-84. PubMed ID: 17638291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal two-phase sampling design for comparing accuracies of two binary classification rules.
Xu H; Hui SL; Grannis S
Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(3):500-13. PubMed ID: 24038175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
