These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22942538)

  • 1. Motivating operations affect stimulus control: a largely overlooked phenomenon in discrimination learning.
    Lotfizadeh AD; Edwards TL; Redner R; Poling A
    Behav Anal; 2012; 35(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 22942538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Motivating operations and stimulus control.
    Edwards TL; Lotfizadeh AD; Poling A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Jul; 112(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 30883795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increasing food deprivation relative to baseline influences D-amphetamine dose-response gradients.
    Lotfizadeh AD; Zimmermann ZJ; Watkins EE; Edwards TL; Poling A
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2014 Oct; 125():65-69. PubMed ID: 25179163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interactions between the effects of food and water motivating operations on food- and water-reinforced responding in mice.
    Lewon M; Spurlock ED; Peters CM; Hayes LJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 May; 111(3):493-507. PubMed ID: 31038215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motivating Operations and Negative Reinforcement.
    Edwards TL; Poling A
    Perspect Behav Sci; 2020 Dec; 43(4):761-778. PubMed ID: 33381687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Motivating Operations and Discriminative Stimuli: Distinguishable but Interactive Variables.
    Poling A; Lotfizadeh AD; Edwards TL
    Behav Anal Pract; 2020 Jun; 13(2):502-508. PubMed ID: 32647607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motivating operations as contexts for operant discrimination training and testing.
    Stites M; Lewon M; Peters CM; Hayes LJ
    Behav Processes; 2022 Nov; 203():104779. PubMed ID: 36395966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of the magnitude of the food deprivation motivating operation on free operant preference in mice.
    Lewon M; Hayes LJ
    Behav Processes; 2015 Jun; 115():135-42. PubMed ID: 25841867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli.
    Michael J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Jan; 37(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 7057126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of altering motivation for food in rats trained with food reinforcement to discriminate between d-amphetamine and saline injections.
    Lotfizadeh AD; Redner R; Edwards TL; Quisenberry AJ; Baker LE; Poling A
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2012 Dec; 103(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 22963928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Separating discriminative and function-altering effects of verbal stimuli.
    Schlinger HD
    Behav Anal; 1993; 16(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 22478128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A descriptive taxonomy of environmental operations and its implications for behavior analysis.
    Schlinger HD; Blakely E
    Behav Anal; 1994; 17(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 22478172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus control and compounding with ambient odor as a discriminative stimulus on a free-operant baseline.
    Cohn SI; Weiss SJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Mar; 87(2):261-73. PubMed ID: 17465315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Manipulating motivating operations to facilitate the emergence of mands for a child with autism.
    Davis BJ; Kahng S; Coryat K
    Anal Verbal Behav; 2012; 28(1):145-50. PubMed ID: 22754113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantal vs. graded generalization in drug discrimination: measuring a graded response.
    Mathis DA; Emmett-Oglesby MW
    J Neurosci Methods; 1990 Jan; 31(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 2407907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of motivating operations and discriminative stimuli on challenging behavior maintained by positive reinforcement.
    Edrisinha C; O'Reilly M; Sigafoos J; Lancioni G; Choi HY
    Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(2):836-45. PubMed ID: 21095097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning about deprivation intensity stimuli.
    Davidson TL
    Behav Neurosci; 1987 Apr; 101(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 3580121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do establishing operations alter reinforcement effectiveness?
    Cherpas C
    Behav Anal; 1993; 16(2):347-9. PubMed ID: 22478163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discriminative stimulus effects of two doses of fentanyl in rats: pharmacological selectivity and effect of training dose on agonist and antagonist effects of mu opioids.
    Zhang L; Walker EA; Sutherland J; Young AM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2000 Feb; 148(2):136-45. PubMed ID: 10663428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Function-altering effects of contingency-specifying stimuli.
    Schlinger H; Blakely E
    Behav Anal; 1987; 10(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 22477959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.