These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22942594)

  • 1. Cephalometric methods of prediction in orthognathic surgery.
    Kolokitha OE; Topouzelis N
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2011 Sep; 10(3):236-45. PubMed ID: 22942594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors influencing the accuracy of cephalometric prediction of soft tissue profile changes following orthognathic surgery.
    Kolokitha OE; Chatzistavrou E
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2012 Mar; 11(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 23450114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of Japanese adults and its usefulness in orthognathic surgery: A retrospective study.
    Yoshikawa H; Tanikawa C; Ito S; Tsukiboshi Y; Ishii H; Kanomi R; Yamashiro T
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Apr; 50(4):353-363. PubMed ID: 35246368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imaging in Orthodontics.
    Tanna NK; AlMuzaini AAAY; Mupparapu M
    Dent Clin North Am; 2021 Jul; 65(3):623-641. PubMed ID: 34051933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a tridimensional cephalometric analysis performed on 3T-MRI compared with CBCT: a pilot study in adults.
    Maspero C; Abate A; Bellincioni F; Cavagnetto D; Lanteri V; Costa A; Farronato M
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Oct; 20(1):40. PubMed ID: 31631241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Algorithm for planning a double-jaw orthognathic surgery using a computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) protocol. Part 2: three-dimensional cephalometry.
    Xia JJ; Gateno J; Teichgraeber JF; Yuan P; Li J; Chen KC; Jajoo A; Nicol M; Alfi DM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 44(12):1441-50. PubMed ID: 26573563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computerized cephalometric evaluation of orthognathic surgical precision and stability in relation to maxillary superior repositioning combined with mandibular advancement or setback.
    Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Hillerup S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Oct; 55(10):1071-9; discussion 1079-80. PubMed ID: 9331229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment outcome in orthognathic surgery-A prospective randomized blinded case-controlled comparison of planning accuracy in computer-assisted two- and three-dimensional planning techniques (part II).
    Bengtsson M; Wall G; Greiff L; Rasmusson L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 45(9):1419-1424. PubMed ID: 28800842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vivo reliability of 3D cephalometric landmark determination on magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.
    Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Zingler S; Saleem MA; Jende JME; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1339-1349. PubMed ID: 31352517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cephalometric and three-dimensional assessment of the posterior airway space and imaging software reliability analysis before and after orthognathic surgery.
    Burkhard JP; Dietrich AD; Jacobsen C; Roos M; Lübbers HT; Obwegeser JA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1428-36. PubMed ID: 24864074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Feasibility of Delaire cephalometric analysis to predict the ideal sagittal position of the maxilla and chin for surgery-first patients in orthognathic surgery].
    Sun XT; He W; Liu XJ; Li ZL; Wang X
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 32071469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnosis and treatment planning of orthodontic patients with 3-dimensional dentofacial records.
    Manosudprasit A; Haghi A; Allareddy V; Masoud MI
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1083-1091. PubMed ID: 28554454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional cephalometry for orthognathic planning: Normative data and analyses.
    Wang RH; Ho CT; Lin HH; Lo LJ
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Jan; 119(1 Pt 2):191-203. PubMed ID: 31003919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment outcomes and patient-reported quality of life after orthognathic surgery with computer-assisted 2- or 3-dimensional planning: A randomized double-blind active-controlled clinical trial.
    Bengtsson M; Wall G; Larsson P; Becktor JP; Rasmusson L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jun; 153(6):786-796. PubMed ID: 29853236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The reliability of a surgery-first orthognathic approach without presurgical orthodontic treatment for skeletal class III dentofacial deformity.
    Choi JW; Lee JY; Yang SJ; Koh KS
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Mar; 74(3):333-41. PubMed ID: 23838836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of 3 Soft Tissue Prediction Methods After Double-Jaw Orthognathic Surgery in Class III Patients.
    Demirsoy KK; Kurt G
    Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Mar; 88(3):323-329. PubMed ID: 34670968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Class II treatment in adults: comparing camouflage orthodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthognathic surgery--a cephalometric study to evaluate various therapeutic effects.
    Kinzinger G; Frye L; Diedrich P
    J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Jan; 70(1):63-91. PubMed ID: 19194676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can a surgery-first orthognathic approach reduce the total treatment time?
    Jeong WS; Choi JW; Kim DY; Lee JY; Kwon SM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 46(4):473-482. PubMed ID: 28043746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review.
    Plooij JM; Maal TJ; Haers P; Borstlap WA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Bergé SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(4):341-52. PubMed ID: 21095103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo comparison of MRI- and CBCT-based 3D cephalometric analysis: beginning of a non-ionizing diagnostic era in craniomaxillofacial imaging?
    Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Weber D; Jende JME; Saleem MA; Zingler S; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 31802215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.