These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22943224)

  • 41. The myth of informed consent in rectal cancer surgery: what do patients retain?
    Scheer AS; O'Connor AM; Chan BP; Moloo H; Poulin EC; Mamazza J; Auer RC; Boushey RP
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Sep; 55(9):970-5. PubMed ID: 22874604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Informed consent in head and neck surgery: how much do patients actually remember?
    Hekkenberg RJ; Irish JC; Rotstein LE; Brown DH; Gullane PJ
    J Otolaryngol; 1997 Jun; 26(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 9176798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Rehearsal's effect on recall and comprehension of orthodontic informed consent.
    Skulski BN; Fields HW; Johnston WM; Robinson FG; Firestone A; Heinlein DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Apr; 159(4):e331-e341. PubMed ID: 33573895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Standardized Consent: The Effect of Information Sheets on Information Retention.
    Clarke K; OʼLoughlin P; Cashman J
    J Patient Saf; 2018 Jun; 14(2):e25-e28. PubMed ID: 26558649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Informed consent for cataract surgery: patient understanding of verbal, written, and videotaped information.
    Shukla AN; Daly MK; Legutko P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jan; 38(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 22062774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Informed consent in otologic surgery: prospective study of risk recall by patients and impact of written summaries of risk.
    Brown TF; Massoud E; Bance M
    J Otolaryngol; 2003 Dec; 32(6):368-72. PubMed ID: 14967081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Improving the informed consent process for surgery.
    Kondziolka DS; Pirris SM; Lunsford LD
    Neurosurgery; 2006 Jun; 58(6):1184-9; discussion 1184-9. PubMed ID: 16723898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Toward an informed discussion of informed consent: a review and critique of the empirical studies.
    Meisel A; Roth LH
    Ariz Law Rev; 1983; 25(2):265-346. PubMed ID: 11658677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A prospective audit on the validity of written informed consent prior to glaucoma surgery: an Asian perspective.
    Kang KD; Abdul Majid AS; Kwag JH; Kim YD; Yim HB
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 May; 248(5):687-701. PubMed ID: 19830443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cataract surgery and consent; recall, anxiety, and attitude toward trainee surgeons preoperatively and postoperatively.
    Vallance JH; Ahmed M; Dhillon B
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jul; 30(7):1479-85. PubMed ID: 15210226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Informed consent for clinical treatment in low-income setting: evaluating the relationship between satisfying consent and extent of recall of consent information.
    Nnabugwu II; Ugwumba FO; Udeh EI; Anyimba SK; Ozoemena OF
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):69. PubMed ID: 29197378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Value of informed consent in tympanoplasty and FESS procedures].
    Riemann R; Demirbas O; Milewski C; Brehmer D
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2010 Mar; 89(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 19960407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Do they listen? A review of information retained by patients following consent for reduction mammoplasty.
    Godwin Y
    Br J Plast Surg; 2000 Mar; 53(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 10878834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Adequacy of consent in patients with distal radius fractures.
    Ahmad R; Shobaki S; Etezadi V; Raju S; Case R
    Int Orthop; 2009 Oct; 33(5):1311-3. PubMed ID: 19347337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of the informed consent process on anxiety and comprehension of patients undergoing esophageal and gastrointestinal surgery.
    Betti S; Sironi A; Saino G; Ricci C; Bonavina L
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2011 Jun; 15(6):922-7. PubMed ID: 21484486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Room for Improvement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on the Informed Consent Process for Emergency Surgery.
    D'Souza RS; Johnson RL; Bettini L; Schulte PJ; Burkle C
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2019 Sep; 94(9):1786-1798. PubMed ID: 31486381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. What do patients recall from informed consent given before orthopedic surgery?
    Sahin N; Oztürk A; Ozkan Y; Demirhan Erdemir A
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2010; 44(6):469-75. PubMed ID: 21358254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Surgical Consent of Children and Guardians for the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis is Incompletely Informed.
    Theologis AA; Anaya A; Sabatini C; Sucato DJ; Parent S; Erickson M; Diab M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 26335670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Enhancing comprehension of information for informed consent: a review of empirical research.
    Silva MC; Sorrell JM
    IRB; 1988; 10(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11658988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Decision-making capacity.
    Gunn MJ; Wong JG; Clare IC; Holland AJ
    Med Law Rev; 1999; 7(3):269-306. PubMed ID: 11885611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.